ArticleEye (London, England)2023
Translating and evaluating the Chinese version of Pediatric Eye Questionnaire (PedEyeQ-CN) for children.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of primary congenital glaucoma with quality of life in children and their families.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- Effect of Individualized and Adaptive Vision Training versus 6 hours of Patching in Children with Residual Amblyopia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
- Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Pediatric Eye Questionnaire in Chinese Children with Uveitis: A Rasch Analysis.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
- Comparison of Functional Vision and Eye-Related Quality of Life between Myopic Children Treated with Orthokeratology and Single-Vision Spectacles in Southern China.Journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Health-related quality of life measurements in children and adolescents with refractive errors: A scoping review.Advances in ophthalmology practice and researchArticle
- Vision-Specific Quality of Life in Children With Cortical or Cerebral Visual Impairment.Journal of visual impairment & blindnessArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate the reliability and validity of Chinese version of the Pediatric Eye Questionnaire (PedEyeQ-CN) by testing ophthalmic patients in China.
methodsThe PedEyeQ (standard English version) was translated by local researchers. Children were asked to complete the Child section, and their parents the Proxy and Parent sections. 160 children (32 normal controls, 77 with refractive error, 48 with strabismus/amblyopia, 3 with other eye conditions) aged 5-11 years old, and one parent of each child were recruited. Cronbach's α and intraclass correlation coefficient were calculated to examine the reliability and test-retest reliability; the score differences between controls and patients were compared to examine the validity.
resultsThe internal consistency (Cronbach's α ≥ 0.76) and test-retest reliability (r > 0.80) of PedEyeQ-CN were robust. Children with eye conditions had lower scores compared with children with normal vision (refractive error: 10 out of 13 domains, P ≤ 0.021; strabismus/amblyopia: all domains, P ≤ 0.015). Children with strabismus/amblyopia had lower scores compared with children with refractive error (two domains, P = 0.048, P = 0.001). Visual acuity was significantly correlated with functional vision (P = 0.005), but not significantly correlated with the eye-related quality of life (ER-QOL).
conclusionsThe PedEyeQ-CN is a valuable tool for assessing the functional vision and ER-QOL of Chinese children and help us increase our understanding about the impact of eye conditions on children and their families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.