Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35760886›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

A general skull stripping of multiparametric brain MRIs using 3D convolutional neural network.

Linmin Pei, Murat Ak, Nourel Hoda M Tahon, Serafettin Zenkin, Safa Alkarawi, Abdallah Kamal, Mahir Yilmaz, Lingling Chen, Mehmet Er, Nursima Ak and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Linmin PeiImaging and Visualization Group, ABCS, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, 21702, USA. Linmin.pei@nih.gov.
Murat AkDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA.
Nourel Hoda M TahonDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA.
Serafettin ZenkinDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA.
Safa AlkarawiDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA.
Abdallah KamalDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA.
Mahir YilmazDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA.
Lingling ChenDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA.
Mehmet ErDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA.
Nursima AkDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA.
Rivka ColenDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA. colenrr@upmc.edu.
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUPMC Hillman Cancer Center · USFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research · USUPMC Health System · US

Funding

VECTOR CORE FACILITYP30CA047904 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Jessie Nedrow · 1988 to 2026
$158.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA047904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate skull stripping facilitates following neuro-image analysis. For computer-aided methods, the presence of brain skull in structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) impacts brain tissue identification, which could result in serious misjudgments, specifically for patients with brain tumors. Though there are several existing works on skull stripping in literature, most of them either focus on healthy brain MRIs or only apply for a single image modality. These methods may be not optimal for multiparametric MRI scans. In the paper, we propose an ensemble neural network (EnNet), a 3D convolutional neural network (3DCNN) based method, for brain extraction on multiparametric MRI scans (mpMRIs). We comprehensively investigate the skull stripping performance by using the proposed method on a total of 15 image modality combinations. The comparison shows that utilizing all modalities provides the best performance on skull stripping. We have collected a retrospective dataset of 815 cases with/without glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) and The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA). The ground truths of the skull stripping are verified by at least one qualified radiologist. The quantitative evaluation gives an average dice score coefficient and Hausdorff distance at the 95th percentile, respectively. We also compare the performance to the state-of-the-art methods/tools. The proposed method offers the best performance.The contributions of the work have five folds: first, the proposed method is a fully automatic end-to-end for skull stripping using a 3D deep learning method. Second, it is applicable for mpMRIs and is also easy to customize for any MRI modality combination. Third, the proposed method not only works for healthy brain mpMRIs but also pre-/post-operative brain mpMRIs with GBM. Fourth, the proposed method handles multicenter data. Finally, to the best of our knowledge, we are the first group to quantitatively compare the skull stripping performance using different modalities. All code and pre-trained model are available at: https://github.com/plmoer/skull_stripping_code_SR .

Indexed as

GlioblastomaMultiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmsBrainHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerRetrospective StudiesSkull

Identifiers

PMID35760886
PMCPMC9237075
OpenAlexW4283588740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.