Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35760806›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Heterologous expression of cry3Bb1 and cry3 genes for enhanced resistance against insect pests in cotton.

Muhammad Mubashar Zafar, Ghulam Mustafa, Fiza Shoukat, Atif Idrees, Arfan Ali, Faiza Sharif, Amir Shakeel, Huijuan Mo, Yuan Youlu, Qurban Ali and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Characterization ofSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Muhammad Mubashar ZafarState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Key Laboratory of Biological and Genetic Breeding of Cotton, The Ministry of Agriculture, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Anyang, 455000, Henan, China.
Ghulam MustafaCenter of Agricultural Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Fiza ShoukatCenter of Agricultural Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Atif IdreesGuangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Conservation and Resource Utilization, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Wild Animal Conservation and Utilization, Institute of Zoology, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510260, China.
Arfan AliFB Genetics, Four Brothers Group, Lahore, Pakistan.
Faiza SharifUniversity Institute of Physical Therapy, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Amir ShakeelDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Huijuan MoState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Key Laboratory of Biological and Genetic Breeding of Cotton, The Ministry of Agriculture, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Anyang, 455000, Henan, China.
Yuan YouluState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Key Laboratory of Biological and Genetic Breeding of Cotton, The Ministry of Agriculture, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Anyang, 455000, Henan, China.
Qurban AliInstitute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Abdul RazzaqState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Key Laboratory of Biological and Genetic Breeding of Cotton, The Ministry of Agriculture, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Anyang, 455000, Henan, China. biolformanite@gmail.com.
Maozhi RenState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Key Laboratory of Biological and Genetic Breeding of Cotton, The Ministry of Agriculture, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Anyang, 455000, Henan, China. renmaozhi01@caas.cn.
Fuguang LiState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Key Laboratory of Biological and Genetic Breeding of Cotton, The Ministry of Agriculture, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Anyang, 455000, Henan, China. lifuguang@caas.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transgenic technology played a crucial role in developing insect-resistant plants resulting in the reduced application of pesticides. This article reports the expression of two cry proteins (Cry3Bb1 and Cry3) in cotton for enhanced resistance against chewing insect pests. The aforementioned genes were synthetically developed and were cloned under appropriate regulatory sequences followed by transformation into Eagle-2 genotype (Gossypium hirsutum) of cotton through shoot apex-cut Agro-infiltration. The transgene integration was validated by polymerase chain reaction using primers flanking the aforementioned cry genes. Transgene expression was assessed by qRT-PCR using GADPH as a reference gene. The relative fold expression analyses revealed the highest expression of the transgene(s) in M1 plants, which is a 4.5-fold expression (Cry3 + Cry3Bb1) followed by M3 (fold expression, 3.0) (Cry3Bb1) and M2 (fold expression, 2.5) (Cry3) transformants of cotton. The confirmed transgenic plants were exposed to insect pests, pink bollworm (Pectinophora gossypiella), and army bollworm (Helicoverpa armigera). Bioassay results revealed that 60% mortality was observed against pink bollworm, and 75% mortality was observed against army bollworm in transgenic plants containing both Cry3Bb1 and Cry3 genes (M1 transgenic plants). In M2 transgenic plants containing only the Cry3Bb1 gene, the mortality was observed to be 40% in the pink bollworm population, whereas 45% mortality was observed in the army bollworm population. In the case of M3 transgenic plants containing single gene-Cry3, the mortality was 20% in the pink bollworm population, whereas 30% mortality was observed in the army bollworm population. Almost no mortality was observed in non-transgenic Eagle-2 control plants. Hence, the developed cotton transformants have improved resistance against chewing insect pests.

Indexed as

GossypiumMothsAnimalsBacillus thuringiensis ToxinsBacterial ProteinsEndotoxinsHemolysin ProteinsInsecticide ResistancePlants, Genetically ModifiedBacillus thuringiensis ToxinsBacterial ProteinsEndotoxinsHemolysin Proteins

Identifiers

PMID35760806
PMCPMC9237104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.