ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2022
Differential Auditory and Visual Phase-Locking Are Observed during Audio-Visual Benefit and Silent Lip-Reading for Speech Perception.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hallucination Proneness is Linked to Over-Reliance on Internal Priors for Noisy Speech.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2026Article
- Cortical speech envelope tracking reflects lesion-symptom profiles in post-stroke aphasia.Brain communications · 2026Article
- Stereoelectroencephalography Reveals Neural Signatures of Multisensory Integration in the Human Superior Temporal Sulcus during Audiovisual Speech Perception.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Eye Movements in Silent Visual Speech Track Unheard Acoustic Signals and Relate to Hearing Experience.eNeuro · 2025Article
- Immersive auditory-cognitive training improves speech-in-noise perception in older adults with varying hearing and working memory.NPJ science of learning · 2025Article
- Atypical audio-visual neural synchrony and speech processing in early autism.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2025Article
- Article
- Visual congruency of performers' movements enhances vocal music reward through Mu entrainment.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2025Article
- Multi-timescale neural dynamics for multisensory integration.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2024Review
- Pupil diameter as an indicator of sound pair familiarity after statistically structured auditory sequence.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Can youImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Speech perception in noisy environments is enhanced by seeing facial movements of communication partners. However, the neural mechanisms by which audio and visual speech are combined are not fully understood. We explore MEG phase-locking to auditory and visual signals in MEG recordings from 14 human participants (6 females, 8 males) that reported words from single spoken sentences. We manipulated the acoustic clarity and visual speech signals such that critical speech information is present in auditory, visual, or both modalities. MEG coherence analysis revealed that both auditory and visual speech envelopes (auditory amplitude modulations and lip aperture changes) were phase-locked to 2-6 Hz brain responses in auditory and visual cortex, consistent with entrainment to syllable-rate components. Partial coherence analysis was used to separate neural responses to correlated audio-visual signals and showed non-zero phase-locking to auditory envelope in occipital cortex during audio-visual (AV) speech. Furthermore, phase-locking to auditory signals in visual cortex was enhanced for AV speech compared with audio-only speech that was matched for intelligibility. Conversely, auditory regions of the superior temporal gyrus did not show above-chance partial coherence with visual speech signals during AV conditions but did show partial coherence in visual-only conditions. Hence, visual speech enabled stronger phase-locking to auditory signals in visual areas, whereas phase-locking of visual speech in auditory regions only occurred during silent lip-reading. Differences in these cross-modal interactions between auditory and visual speech signals are interpreted in line with cross-modal predictive mechanisms during speech perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.