Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35760493›Full record

Trial reportGut2022

Double-blinded randomised placebo controlled trial of enterosgel (polymethylsiloxane polyhydrate) for the treatment of IBS with diarrhoea (IBS-D).

Carol Angela Howell, Anu Kemppinen, Victoria Allgar, Matthew Dodd, Charles H Knowles, John McLaughlin, Preeti Pandya, Peter Whorwell, Elena Markaryan, Yan Yiannakou

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gut, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Carol Angela HowellResearch, Enteromed Ltd, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5713-6177
Anu KemppinenClever Cookie Ltd, Hove, UK.
Victoria AllgarFaculty of Health, Peninsula Medical School, Plymouth, UK.
Matthew DoddDepartment of Medical Statistics, School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicin, London, UK.
Charles H KnowlesQueen Mary University Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Blizard Institute, London, UK.
John McLaughlinDivision of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Preeti PandyaThe Village Practice, Thornton-Cleveleys, UK.
Peter WhorwellNeurogastroenterology Unit, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Elena MarkaryanResearch, Enteromed Ltd, London, UK.
Yan YiannakouDepartment of Gastroenterology, County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust, Darlington, UK yan.yiannakou@nhs.net.
Enteromed (United Kingdom) · GBChildren’s Village · USCounty Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust · GBDiabetes Australia · AUFaculty of Public Health · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBWythenshawe Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIrritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea (IBS-D) is a common and challenging condition that significantly reduces quality of life. Enterosgel (polymethylsiloxane polyhydrate) is an intestinal adsorbent which sequesters harmful molecules and is safe and effective in acute infective diarrhoea. This randomised controlled multicentre trial aimed to investigate its safety and efficacy in patients with IBS-D.

designAfter a 2-week screening phase, participants were randomised into an 8-week double-blind phase, followed by an 8-week open-label and follow-up phase. Participants recorded stool consistency, pain and global symptoms in e-diaries and questionnaires. The primary outcome was the percentage of responders on a composite abdominal pain (≥30% decrease in the weekly score) and stool consistency (50% reduction in days per week with at least one stool of BSFS type 6 or 7) score during at least 4 weeks of the treatment period.

results440 patients with IBS-D were randomised to the double-blind phase with 393 continuing to the open-label phase. The Primary outcome responder rate by intention-to-treat for enterosgel versus placebo was 37.4% vs 24.3% (OR 1.95, NNT 8, p=0.002). Enterosgel also improved stool consistency (48.5% vs 32.5%, p<0.0001) abdominal pain (53.3% vs 40.2%, p=0.003), stool frequency (treatment effect -0.32 (-0.62 to -0.02)) and urgency (treatment effect -0.59 (-0.85 to -0.33)). 60% of patients reported adequate relief of symptoms after open-label treatment. Adverse event frequency was similar in both groups, with no serious events attributable to enterosgel.

conclusionEnterosgel is safe and effective in IBS-D, providing an alternative to the limited current treatment options. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN17149988.

Indexed as

Irritable Bowel SyndromeAbdominal PainDiarrheaDouble-Blind MethodHumansQuality of LifeSiliconesTreatment OutcomepolymethylsiloxaneSiliconesabdominal paindiarrhoeairritable bowel syndrome

Identifiers

PMID35760493
PMCPMC9664110
OpenAlexW4283578361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.