Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35760407›Full record

ArticleAnimal bioscience2022

Effect of feeding fermented soybean meal on broiler chickens' performance: a meta-analysis.

Agung Irawan, Adi Ratriyanto, Adib Norma Respati, Niati Ningsih, Rahma Fitriastuti, Wara Pratitis Sabar Suprayogi, Rendi Fathoni Hadi, Wahyu Setyono, Novi Akhirini, Anuraga Jayanegara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal bioscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Microorganisms · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Optimal Supplementation of Fermented Product Produced byAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Agung IrawanVocational School, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta 57126, Indonesia.
Adi RatriyantoDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta 57126 Indonesia.
Adib Norma RespatiDepartment of Animal Production, Politeknik Negeri Jember, Jember 68124 Indonesia.
Niati NingsihDepartment of Animal Production, Politeknik Negeri Jember, Jember 68124 Indonesia.
Rahma FitriastutiPoliteknik Pertanian Negeri Pangkajene Kepulauan, South Sulawesi 90761, Indonesia.
Wara Pratitis Sabar SuprayogiVocational School, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta 57126, Indonesia.
Rendi Fathoni HadiVocational School, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta 57126, Indonesia.
Wahyu SetyonoVocational School, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta 57126, Indonesia.
Novi AkhiriniVocational School, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta 57126, Indonesia.
Anuraga JayanegaraAnimal Feed and Nutrition Modelling Research Group (AFENUE), Department of Nutrition and Feed Technology, Faculty of Animal Science, IPB University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia.

Funding

Institute of Research and Community Service of Universitas Sebelas Maret 254/UN27.22/PT.01.03/2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe present study aimed to quantify the effects of fermented soybean meal (FSBM) on broiler chickens' performance by employing a meta-analysis approach.

methodsA total of 16 studies were included in the database after being systematically selected using a PRISMA protocol. Hedges' g effect size was used to quantify pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) using random-effects models at 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Publication bias among studies was computed with Egger's test and visualized using funnel plots.

resultsResults indicated that dietary FSBM inclusion increased final body weight (BW) (SMD = 0.586, 95% CI: 0.221 to 0.951, p = 0.002) of broiler chickens, particularly in starter period (SMD = 0.691, 95% CL: 0.149 to 1.233, p = 0.013) while in the finisher period, the effect was weaker (SMD = 0.509, 95% CI: 0.015 to 1.004, p = 0.043). Average daily gain (ADG), feed intake (FI), and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were not affected with FSBM inclusion when compared to control. Subgroup analysis revealed that FI increased in starter period (SMD = 0.582, 95% CI: 0.037 to 1.128, p = 0.036). When considering types of microorganism as moderating variables in the subgroup analysis, we found that Aspergillus oryzae, mixed probiotics+bromelain protease, Bacillus subtilis, and Lactobacillus bacteria significantly increased ADG and FI (p<0.01). Additionally, either Bacillus subtilis+protease or Bacillus subtilis alone decreased FCR (p<0.001). However, meta-regression analysis showed that levels of FSBM inclusion had no effects on final BW (p = 0.502), ADG (p = 0.588), FI (p = 0.861), and FCR (p = 0.462).

conclusionSubstituting SBM in broiler chickens' diet with FSBM improved BW of broiler chickens, especially in the starter period whereas the effects on ADG, FI, and FCR were mostly dependent on microbial strains used for fermentation.

Indexed as

Broiler ChickensFermentationInoculantMeta-analysisSoybean Meal

Identifiers

PMID35760407
PMCPMC9659450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.