Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35760397›Full record

ReviewACS biomaterials science & engineering2022

Developer's Guide to an Organ-on-Chip Model.

Julia Rogal, Katharina Schlünder, Peter Loskill

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS biomaterials science & engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Tissue chips as headway model and incitement technology.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Twenty years ofFrontiers in toxicology · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julia RogalDepartment for Microphysiological Systems, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen 72074, Germany.
Katharina SchlünderDepartment for Microphysiological Systems, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen 72074, Germany.
Peter LoskillDepartment for Microphysiological Systems, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen 72074, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5000-0581

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decade, organ-on-chip research has been one of the most prolific areas of the entire field of tissue engineering. The development of organ-on-chip models requires an integrated interdisciplinary approach merging technologies and concepts from several different disciplines, including microfabrication, microfluidics, biomaterials, stem cell science, pharma-/toxicology, and medicine. In this perspective, we follow the journey of an organ-on-chip through its many different stages, from (i) the initial idea/specific scientific question to (ii) the design/concept phase, (iii) the engineering (fabrication and materials, sensor/actuator integration) and (iv) biology considerations (cell sources, biomaterials/scaffold), (v) the cell injection and tissue assembly process, (vi) the assay development, and (vii) the functional validation, all the way to (viii) the final applications. By summarizing some of the key learnings and findings from a developer's perspective and identifying suitable introductory reviews, this perspective strives to provide a conceptual, stepwise guide for the holistic development of an organ-on-chip model.

Indexed as

Lab-On-A-Chip DevicesMicrofluidicsBiocompatible MaterialsStem CellsTissue EngineeringBiocompatible Materialsin vitro modelsmicrofluidicsmicrophysiological systemsorgan-on-chiptissue chipstissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID35760397
PMCPMC9667877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.