Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35760187›Full record

ArticleJournal of affective disorders2022

Prenatal stress from the COVID-19 pandemic predicts maternal postpartum anxiety as moderated by psychological factors: The Australian BITTOC Study.

Amber-Lee Di Paolo, Suzanne King, Mia A McLean, Belinda Lequertier, Guillaume Elgbeili, Sue Kildea, Hannah G Dahlen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of affective disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amber-Lee Di PaoloDouglas Institute Research Centre, 6875 Boulevard LaSalle, Verdun, QC H4H 1R3, Canada.
Suzanne KingDouglas Institute Research Centre, 6875 Boulevard LaSalle, Verdun, QC H4H 1R3, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, 1033 Avenue des Pins, Montreal, QC H3A 1A1, Canada. Electronic address: suzanne.king@mcgill.ca.
Mia A McLeanDepartment of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Belinda LequertierMolly Wardaguga Research Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Charles Darwin University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Guillaume ElgbeiliDouglas Institute Research Centre, 6875 Boulevard LaSalle, Verdun, QC H4H 1R3, Canada.
Sue KildeaMolly Wardaguga Research Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Charles Darwin University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Hannah G DahlenSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.
Charles Darwin University · AUWestern Sydney University · AU

Funding

CIHR PJT-148903
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile there have been reports of increased perinatal anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic (Stepowicz et al., 2020), there has been a lack of research on the relative importance of objective hardship and subjective distress. In this study, we explored the extent to which resilience, tolerance of uncertainty, and cognitive appraisal of the pandemic's consequences moderate the effect of prenatal objective hardship and subjective distress due to the pandemic on 2-month postpartum anxiety.

methodsData were collected as part of the Birth in the Time of COVID (BITTOC) study. We measured objective hardship and subjective distress, mental health, and potential psychological moderators in 419 pregnant women residing in Australia, and at two months postpartum. Hierarchical multiple regressions were used.

resultsObjective hardship and subjective distress independently predicted postpartum anxiety. All three psychological factors moderated the effect of objective hardship on anxiety. For women with low/neutral resilience, or low/moderate tolerance of uncertainty, or a negative cognitive appraisal, greater objective hardship predicted higher postpartum anxiety. Conversely, for women with high resilience, or high tolerance of uncertainty, or neutral/positive cognitive appraisal, there was no association. Only a neutral/positive cognitive appraisal significantly buffered the effect of subjective distress on anxiety. LIMITATIONS: Participants self-selected themselves into the study. The generalizability of our results could be restricted to women of higher socio-economic status.

conclusionsThese findings help us better understand options for intervention and assessment of vulnerable women during times of stress, along with the mechanisms by which COVID-related stress during pregnancy contributes to postpartum anxiety.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAnxietyAustraliaDepressionFemaleHumansPostpartum PeriodPregnancyStress, PsychologicalAnxietyCognitive appraisalCOVID-19Prenatal maternal stressResilienceTolerance of uncertainty

Identifiers

PMID35760187
PMCPMC9232265
OpenAlexW4283450221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.