Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35759952›Full record

ArticleHealth & place2022

Continuing inequalities in COVID-19 mortality in England and Wales, and the changing importance of regional, over local, deprivation.

Gareth J Griffith, Gwilym Owen, David Manley, Laura D Howe, George Davey Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health & place, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gareth J GriffithMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2BN, United Kingdom; Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, BS8 2BN, United Kingdom. Electronic address: g.griffith@bristol.ac.uk.
Gwilym OwenDepartment of Public Health and Policy, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GL, United Kingdom.
David ManleySchool of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1SS, United Kingdom.
Laura D HoweMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2BN, United Kingdom; Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, BS8 2BN, United Kingdom.
George Davey SmithMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2BN, United Kingdom; Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, BS8 2BN, United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00011/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObservational studies have highlighted that where individuals live is far more important for risk of dying with COVID-19, than for dying of other causes. Deprivation is commonly proposed as explaining such differences. During the period of localised restrictions in late 2020, areas with higher restrictions tended to be more deprived. We explore how this impacted the relationship between deprivation and mortality and see whether local or regional deprivation matters more for inequalities in COVID-19 mortality.

methodsWe use publicly available population data on deaths due to COVID-19 and all-cause mortality between March 2020 and April 2021 to investigate the scale of spatial inequalities. We use a multiscale approach to simultaneously consider three spatial scales through which processes driving inequalities may act. We go on to explore whether deprivation explains such inequalities.

resultsAdjusting for population age structure and number of care homes, we find highest regional inequality in October 2020, with a COVID-19 mortality rate ratio of 5.86 (95% CI 3.31 to 19.00) for the median between-region comparison. We find spatial context is most important, and spatial inequalities higher, during periods of low mortality. Almost all unexplained spatial inequality in October 2020 is removed by adjusting for deprivation. During October 2020, one standard deviation increase in regional deprivation was associated with 20% higher local mortality (95% CI, 1.10 to 1.30).

conclusionsSpatial inequalities are greatest in periods of lowest overall mortality, implying that as mortality declines it does not do so equally. During the prolonged period of low restrictions and low mortality in summer 2020, spatial inequalities strongly increased. Contrary to previous months, we show that the strong spatial patterning during autumn 2020 is almost entirely explained by deprivation. As overall mortality declines, policymakers must be proactive in detecting areas where this is not happening, or risk worsening already strong health inequalities.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health Status DisparitiesEnglandHumansMortalitySocioeconomic FactorsWalesCoronavirusDeprivationGeographyInequalitySocio-economic position

Identifiers

PMID35759952
PMCPMC9212751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.