Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35759791›Full record

ArticleJMIR aging2022

Shared Decision-Making Training for Home Care Teams to Engage Frail Older Adults and Caregivers in Housing Decisions: Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial.

Évèhouénou Lionel Adisso, Monica Taljaard, Dawn Stacey, Nathalie Brière, Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun, Pierre Jacob Durand, Louis-Paul Rivest, France Légaré

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR aging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02592525 (Implementing Shared Decision Making in Interprofessional Home Care Teams), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02592525 nacompletednot on this map

Implementing Shared Decision Making in Interprofessional Home Care Teams : a Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCHU de Quebec-Universite LavalRan2015 to 2018Enrolled653ConditionsAgingArmsIP-SDM training for health professionals
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Évèhouénou Lionel AdissoTier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4978-0613
Monica TaljaardClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3978-8961
Dawn StaceyClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2681-741X
Nathalie BrièreDirection des services multidisciplinaires, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4185-9378
Hervé Tchala Vignon ZomahounTier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6328-5451
Pierre Jacob DurandVITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Quebec, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6373-7208
Louis-Paul RivestDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4351-4127
France LégaréTier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2296-6696
Defence Research and Development Canada · CACentres Intégré Universitaires de Santé et de Services Sociaux · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CAStatistical Research (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFrail older adults and caregivers need support from their home care teams in making difficult housing decisions, such as whether to remain at home, with or without assistance, or move into residential care. However, home care teams are often understaffed and busy, and shared decision-making training is costly. Nevertheless, overall awareness of shared decision-making is increasing. We hypothesized that distributing a decision aid could be sufficient for providing decision support without the addition of shared decision-making training for home care teams.

objectiveWe evaluated the effectiveness of adding web-based training and workshops for care teams in interprofessional shared decision-making to passive dissemination of a decision guide on the proportion of frail older adults or caregivers of cognitively-impaired frail older adults reporting active roles in housing decision-making.

methodsWe conducted a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial with home care teams in 9 health centers in Quebec, Canada. Participants were frail older adults or caregivers of cognitively impaired frail older adults facing housing decisions and receiving care from the home care team at one of the participating health centers. The intervention consisted of a 1.5-hour web-based tutorial for the home care teams plus a 3.5-hour interactive workshop in interprofessional shared decision-making using a decision guide that was designed to support frail older adults and caregivers in making housing decisions. The control was passive dissemination of the decision guide. The primary outcome was an active role in decision-making among frail older adults and caregivers, measured using the Control Preferences Scale. Secondary outcomes included decisional conflict and perceptions of how much care teams involved frail older adults and caregivers in decision-making. We performed an intention-to-treat analysis.

resultsA total of 311 frail older adults were included in the analysis, including 208 (66.9%) women, with a mean age of 81.2 (SD 7.5) years. Among 339 caregivers of cognitively-impaired frail older adults, 239 (70.5%) were female and their mean age was 66.4 (SD 11.7) years. The intervention increased the proportion of frail older adults reporting an active role in decision-making by 3.3% (95% CI -5.8% to 12.4%, P=.47) and the proportion of caregivers of cognitively-impaired frail older adults by 6.1% (95% CI -11.2% to 23.4%, P=.49). There was no significant impact on the secondary outcomes. However, the mean score for the frail older adults' perception of how much health professionals involved them in decision-making increased by 5.4 (95% CI -0.6 to 11.4, P=.07) and the proportion of caregivers who reported decisional conflict decreased by 7.5% (95% CI -16.5% to 1.6%, P=.10).

conclusionsAlthough it slightly reduced decisional conflict for caregivers, shared decision-making training did not equip home care teams significantly better than provision of a decision aid for involving frail older adults and their caregivers in decision-making.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02592525; https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02592525.

Indexed as

home carenursing homespatient engagementshared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID35759791
PMCPMC9533197
OpenAlexW4283588338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.