Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35759753›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical education2022

An Innovative Use of Twitter to Disseminate and Promote Medical Student Scholarship During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Usability Study.

Gary Allen, Jenna Garris, Luan Lawson, Timothy Reeder, Jennifer Crotty, Johanna Hannan, Kori Brewer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gary AllenBrody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4111-1597
Jenna GarrisOffice of Medical Education, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3445-2614
Luan LawsonOffice of Medical Education, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8408-2581
Timothy ReederDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0315-864X
Jennifer CrottyDepartment of Pediatrics, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5034-750X
Johanna HannanDepartment of Physiology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8469-8105
Kori BrewerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9212-8524

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020, the cancellation of in-person learning activities forced every aspect of medical education and student engagement to pivot to a web-based format, including activities supporting the performance and dissemination of scholarly work. At that time, social media had been used to augment in-person conference learning, but it had not been used as the sole platform for scholarly abstract presentations.

objectiveOur aim was to assess the feasibility of using Twitter to provide a completely web-based forum for real-time dissemination of and engagement with student scholarly work as an alternative to a traditional in-person poster presentation session.

methodsThe Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University launched an online Medical Student Scholarship Forum, using Twitter as a platform for students to present scholarly work and prepare for future web-based presentations. A single student forum participant created posts using a standardized template that incorporated student research descriptions, uniform promotional hashtags, and individual poster presentations. Tweets were released over 5 days and analytic data were collected from the Twitter platform. Outcome measures included impressions, engagements, retweets, likes, media engagements, and average daily engagement rate.

resultsDuring the conference, the student leader published 63 tweets promoting the work of 58 students (55 medical and 3 dental students) over 5 days. During the forum and the following week, tweets from the @BrodyDistinctly Twitter account received 63,142 impressions and 7487 engagements, including 187 retweets, 1427 likes, and 2082 media engagements. During the 5 days of the forum, the average daily engagement rate was 12.72%.

conclusionsUsing Twitter as a means of scholarly dissemination resulted in a larger viewing community compared to a traditional in-person event. Early evidence suggests that social media platforms may be an alternative to traditional scholarly presentations. Presenting via Twitter allowed students to receive instantaneous feedback and effectively network with wider academic communities. Additional research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of knowledge uptake, feedback, and networking.

Indexed as

academic promotionCOVID-19disseminationinnovationmedical educationmedical studentplatformscholarshipsocial mediaTwitterweb-based learning

Identifiers

PMID35759753
PMCPMC9285668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.