Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35759752›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2023

Standardizing Cranioplasty Outcomes Following Stroke or Traumatic Brain Injury: Protocol for the Development of a Core Outcome Set.

Harry Mee, Ana M Castaño-Leon, Ivan Timofeev, Amos Adeleye, Indira Devi Bhagavatula, Niklas Marklund, Susanne Muehlschlegel, Katie Bond, Clare Clement, Kirsty Grieve and 17 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 12 institutions in 8 countries.

Harry Mee *Division of Rehabilitation Medicine and Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1314-3962
Ana M Castaño-LeonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7918-5049
Ivan TimofeevDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1168-0393
Amos AdeleyeUniversity of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5966-1431
Indira Devi BhagavatulaDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3272-2465
Niklas MarklundDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Neurosurgery, Lund University, and Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9797-5626
Susanne MuehlschlegelUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School, Massachusetts, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5717-9246
Katie BondDivision of Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9816-7305
Clare ClementBristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5555-433X
Kirsty GrieveDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6511-6731
Nicola OwenDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9802-964X
Gemma WhitingDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5063-0356
Carole TurnerNIHR Global Health Research Group on NeuroTrauma, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8297-4890
Andres Mariano Rubiano EscobarDepartment of Neurosciences and Neurosurgery, Valle Salud IPS (Health Service Provider Institutions) Network, Cali, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8931-3254
Dhaval ShuklaDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7613-1929
Maria PaulAdelaide University, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2188-1946
Judith AllansonDivision of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7089-2874
Valerie PomeroyNeurorehabilitation Department, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4487-823X
Edoardo ViaroliDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7318-4846
Elizabeth WarburtonDivision of Stroke Medicine, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2575-3255
Adam WellsDepartment of Neurosurgery at the University of Adelaide, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4373-347X
Gregory HawrylukSection of Neurosurgery, University of Manitoba, Manitoba, MB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5604-7057
Adel HelmyDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0531-0556
Fahim AnwarDivision of Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1176-0975
Stephen HoneybulDepartment of Neurosurgery, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6841-8356
Peter HutchinsonNIHR Global Health Research Group on NeuroTrauma, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2796-1835
Angelos KoliasNIHR Global Health Research Group on NeuroTrauma, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3992-0587
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBNational Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences · INThe University of Adelaide · AUAt Bristol · GBHospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESLund University · SERoyal Perth Hospital · AUUniversity of East Anglia · GBUniversity of Ibadan · NGUniversity of Manitoba · CAUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCore outcome sets (COSs) are important and necessary as they help standardize reporting in research studies. Cranioplasty following traumatic brain injury (TBI) or stroke is becoming increasingly common, leading to an ever-growing clinical and research interest, especially regarding the optimal material, cost-effectiveness, and timing of cranioplasty concerning neurological recovery and complications. Consequently, heterogeneous reporting of outcomes from such diverse studies has led to limited meta-analysis ability and an ongoing risk of outcome reporting bias. This study aims to define a standardized COS for reporting in all future TBI and stroke cranioplasty studies.

objectiveThis study has four aims: (1) undertake a systematic review to collate the most current outcome measures used within the cranioplasty literature; (2) undertake a qualitative study to understand better the views of clinicians, patients' relatives, and allied health professionals regarding clinical outcomes following cranioplasty; (3) undertake a Delphi survey as part of the process of gaining consensus for the COS; and (4) finalize consensus through a consensus meeting resulting in the COS.

methodsAn international steering committee has been formed to guide the development of the COS. In addition, recommendations from other clinical initiatives such as COMET (Core Outcomes and Effectiveness Trials) and OMERACT (Outcome Measures in Rheumatology) have been adhered to. Phase 1 is data collection through a systematic review and qualitative study. Phase 2 is the COS development through a Delphi survey and consensus meetings with consensus definitions decided and agreed upon before the Delphi survey begins to avoid bias.

resultsPhase 1 started at the end of 2019, following ethical approval in December 2019, and the project completion date is planned for the end of 2022 or beginning of 2023.

conclusionsThis study should result in a consensus on a COS for cranioplasty, following TBI or stroke, to help standardize outcome reporting for future studies, which can be applied to future research and clinical services, help align future studies, build an increased understanding of cranioplasty and its impact on a patient's function and recovery, and help standardize the evidence base. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/37442.

Indexed as

COMETcore outcome setcranioplastydomainshealth InterventionsneurologicalneurologyoutcomerecoveryreportingstrokeTBItraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID35759752
PMCPMC10152332
OpenAlexW4283703477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.