ReviewHealth affairs (Project Hope)2022
Can Alternative Payment Models And Value-Based Insurance Design Alter The Course Of Diabetes In The United States?
Review in Health affairs (Project Hope), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Alternative Payment Models and Diabetes Outcomes.Current diabetes reports · 2026Review
- 1. Improving Care and Promoting Health in Populations: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2026.Diabetes care · 2026Review
- How to Fix a Broken Health Care System: Pathways to Maximize Health and Well-being for All.Diabetes care · 2026Review
- 1. Improving Care and Promoting Health in Populations: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.Diabetes care · 2025Review
- Community-engaged Systems for Population Health Improvement: A Novel Approach to Improve Diabetes Outcomes in Rural Communities.Journal of community health · 2024Article
- Who participates in value-based care models? Physician characteristics and implications for value-based care.Health affairs scholar · 2024Article
- The National Clinical Care Commission Report to Congress: Recommendations to Better Leverage Federal Policies and Programs to Prevent and Control Diabetes.Diabetes care · 2023Review
- Medicare Coverage for Diabetes Management: A Primary Care Professional's Guide to Advocacy and Navigation.Diabetes, obesity, and cardiometabolic CAREArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diabetes process and outcome measures are common quality measures in payment reform models, including Alternative Payment Models (APMs) and value-based insurance design (VBID). In this commentary we review evidence from selected research to examine whether these payment models can improve the value of diabetes care. We found that higher-risk APMs yielded greater improvements in diabetes process measures than lower-risk APMs, and that VBID models appeared to improve medication adherence but not other quality measures. We argue that these models are promising first steps in redesigning the payment system to improve diabetes care. However, greater coordination and alignment across models is needed to enhance their impact on providers' behavior, diabetes care processes, and patient health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.