Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35759691›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2022

Effect of Nitric Oxide via Cardiopulmonary Bypass on Ventilator-Free Days in Young Children Undergoing Congenital Heart Disease Surgery: The NITRIC Randomized Clinical Trial.

Luregn J Schlapbach, Kristen S Gibbons, Stephen B Horton, Kerry Johnson, Debbie A Long, David H F Buckley, Simon Erickson, Marino Festa, Yves d'Udekem, Nelson Alphonso and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. REstrictive versus StandarD FlUid Management in Mechanically Ventilated ChildrEn Admitted to PICU: a pilot randomized controlled trial (REDUCE-1).Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2026
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Preventing pediatric acute kidney injury: is it even possible?Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Recruitment of CCR5Genes and immunity · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Paediatric Study Group (ANZICS PSG): 20 Years of Collaborative Research.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 12 institutions in 5 countries.

Luregn J SchlapbachChild Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Kristen S GibbonsChild Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Stephen B HortonCardiac Surgical Unit, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Kerry JohnsonChild Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Debbie A LongChild Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
David H F BuckleyPaediatric Intensive Care Unit, Starship Children's Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Simon EricksonPaediatric Critical Care, Perth Children's Hospital, Western Australia and The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.
Marino FestaKids Critical Care Research, Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Yves d'UdekemFaculty of Medicine, Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Nelson AlphonsoChild Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
David S WinlawHeart Centre for Children, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Carmel DelzoppoFaculty of Medicine, Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Kim van LoonDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Mark JonesInstitute of Evidence Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Paul J YoungThe Intensive Care Research Programme, Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
Warwick ButtFaculty of Medicine, Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Andreas SchiblerCritical Care Research Group, Wesley Medical Research, St Andrew's War Memorial Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
NITRIC Study Group, the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group (ANZICS CTG), and the ANZICS Paediatric Study Group (PSG)
The University of Queensland · AURoyal Children's Hospital · AUBond University · AUChildren's Hospital at Westmead · AUMedical Research Institute of New Zealand · NZQueensland University of Technology · AUStarship Children's Health · NZThe University of Melbourne · AUThe University of Sydney · AUThe University of Western Australia · AUUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLWesley Research Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: In children undergoing heart surgery, nitric oxide administered into the gas flow of the cardiopulmonary bypass oxygenator may reduce postoperative low cardiac output syndrome, leading to improved recovery and shorter duration of respiratory support. It remains uncertain whether nitric oxide administered into the cardiopulmonary bypass oxygenator improves ventilator-free days (days alive and free from mechanical ventilation). Objective: To determine the effect of nitric oxide applied into the cardiopulmonary bypass oxygenator vs standard care on ventilator-free days in children undergoing surgery for congenital heart disease. Design, Setting, and Participants: Double-blind, multicenter, randomized clinical trial in 6 pediatric cardiac surgical centers in Australia, New Zealand, and the Netherlands. A total of 1371 children younger than 2 years undergoing congenital heart surgery were randomized between July 2017 and April 2021, with 28-day follow-up of the last participant completed on May 24, 2021. Interventions: Patients were assigned to receive nitric oxide at 20 ppm delivered into the cardiopulmonary bypass oxygenator (n = 679) or standard care cardiopulmonary bypass without nitric oxide (n = 685). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the number of ventilator-free days from commencement of bypass until day 28. There were 4 secondary end points including a composite of low cardiac output syndrome, extracorporeal life support, or death; length of stay in the intensive care unit; length of stay in the hospital; and postoperative troponin levels. Results: Among 1371 patients who were randomized (mean [SD] age, 21.2 [23.5] weeks; 587 girls [42.8%]), 1364 (99.5%) completed the trial. The number of ventilator-free days did not differ significantly between the nitric oxide and standard care groups, with a median of 26.6 days (IQR, 24.4 to 27.4) vs 26.4 days (IQR, 24.0 to 27.2), respectively, for an absolute difference of -0.01 days (95% CI, -0.25 to 0.22; P = .92). A total of 22.5% of the nitric oxide group and 20.9% of the standard care group developed low cardiac output syndrome within 48 hours, needed extracorporeal support within 48 hours, or died by day 28, for an adjusted odds ratio of 1.12 (95% CI, 0.85 to 1.47). Other secondary outcomes were not significantly different between the groups. Conclusions and Relevance: In children younger than 2 years undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery for congenital heart disease, the use of nitric oxide via cardiopulmonary bypass did not significantly affect the number of ventilator-free days. These findings do not support the use of nitric oxide delivered into the cardiopulmonary bypass oxygenator during heart surgery. Trial Registration: anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12617000821392.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary BypassHeart Defects, CongenitalNitric OxideRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory InsufficiencyRespiratory System AgentsAustraliaCardiac Output, LowCardiac Surgical ProceduresDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleNetherlandsNitric OxideRespiratory System Agents

Identifiers

PMID35759691
PMCPMC9237803
OpenAlexW4283578215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.