ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022
Cosmogenic nuclide dating of
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proportional limb strengths signal an adaptive shift in arboreality in early human evolution.Science advances · 2026Article
- Brain structure and function in Homo naledi.Brain structure & function · 2026Review
- SwartkransProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Bipedalism or bipedalisms: The os coxae of StW 573.Journal of anatomy · 2026Article
- Comparative Sulcal Morphology of the Late Miocene Fossil Ape, Rudapithecus hungaricus.American journal of biological anthropology · 2026Article
- Phalangeal cortical bone distribution reveals different dexterous and climbing behaviors inScience advances · 2025Article
- Review
- A biochronological date of 3.6 million years for "Little Foot" (StW 573, Australopithecus prometheus from Sterkfontein, South Africa).Evolutionary anthropology · 2024Article
- Dart and the Taung juvenile: making sense of a century-old record of hominin evolution in Africa.Biology letters · 2024Review
- Article
- Reappraising the palaeobiology of Australopithecus.Nature · 2023Review
- Monkey fossils do not negate cosmogenic dating at Sterkfontein.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Reply to Granger et al.: Multiple, independent lines of evidence suggest Sterkfontein is less than 2.8 My old.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Article
- Telling time with monkeys.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Biochronology of South African hominin-bearing sites: A reassessment using cercopithecid primates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Eolian chronology reveals causal links between tectonics, climate, and erg generation.Nature communications · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sterkfontein is the most prolific single source of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.