Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35759511›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2022

Recombinant vesicular stomatitis vaccine against Nipah virus has a favorable safety profile: Model for assessment of live vaccines with neurotropic potential.

Thomas P Monath, Richard Nichols, Lynda Tussey, Kelly Scappaticci, Thaddeus G Pullano, Mary D Whiteman, Nikos Vasilakis, Shannan L Rossi, Rafael Kroon Campos, Sasha R Azar and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Viral vector-based therapeutic HPV vaccines.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas P MonathPublic Health Vaccines LLC, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7509-4599
Richard NicholsPublic Health Vaccines LLC, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Lynda TusseyPublic Health Vaccines LLC, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Kelly ScappaticciPublic Health Vaccines LLC, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Thaddeus G PullanoPublic Health Vaccines LLC, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Mary D WhitemanBioReliance Corporation, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America.
Nikos VasilakisDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, United States of America.
Shannan L RossiDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, United States of America.
Rafael Kroon CamposDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, United States of America.
Sasha R AzarDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, United States of America.
Heidi M SprattDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Population Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, United States of America.
Brent L SeatonQ2 Solutions, San Juan Capistrano, California, United States of America.
W Tad ArchambaultVirtuStat, North Wales Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Yanina V CostecaldeAmplifyBio, West Jefferson, Ohio, United States of America.
Evan H MooreBattelle Memorial Institute, West Jefferson, Ohio, United States of America.
Roger J HawksBattelle Memorial Institute, West Jefferson, Ohio, United States of America.
Joan FuscoPublic Health Vaccines LLC, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Human Immunome Project · USThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · USBattelle · USBioReliance (United States) · USQ2 Solutions (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nipah virus (NiV) disease is a bat-borne zoonosis responsible for outbreaks with high lethality and is a priority for vaccine development. With funding from the Coalition of Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), we are developing a chimeric vaccine (PHV02) composed of recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) expressing the envelope glycoproteins of both Ebola virus (EBOV) and NiV. The EBOV glycoprotein (GP) mediates fusion and viral entry and the NiV attachment glycoprotein (G) is a ligand for cell receptors, and stimulates neutralizing antibody, the putative mediator of protection against NiV. PHV02 is identical in construction to the registered Ebola vaccine (Ervebo) with the addition of the NiV G gene. NiV ephrin B2 and B3 receptors are expressed on neural cells and the wild-type NiV is neurotropic and causes encephalitis in affected patients. It was therefore important to assess whether the NiV G alters tropism of the rVSV vector and serves as a virulence factor. PHV02 was fully attenuated in adult hamsters inoculated by the intramuscular (IM) route, whereas parental wild-type VSV was 100% lethal. Two rodent models (mice, hamsters) were infected by the intracerebral (IC) route with graded doses of PHV02. Comparator active controls in various experiments included rVSV-EBOV (representative of Ebola vaccine) and yellow fever (YF) 17DD commercial vaccine. These studies showed PHV02 to be more neurovirulent than both rVSV-EBOV and YF 17DD in infant animals. PHV02 was lethal for adult hamsters inoculated IC but not for adult mice. In contrast YF 17DD retained virulence for adult mice inoculated IC but was not virulent for adult hamsters. Because of the inconsistency of neurovirulence patterns in the rodent models, a monkey neurovirulence test (MNVT) was performed, using YF 17DD as the active comparator because it has a well-established profile of quantifiable microscopic changes in brain centers and a known reporting rate of neurotropic adverse events in humans. In the MNVT PHV02 was significantly less neurovirulent than the YF 17DD vaccine reference control, indicating that the vaccine will have an acceptable safety profile for humans. The findings are important because they illustrate the complexities of phenotypic assessment of novel viral vectors with tissue tropisms determined by transgenic proteins, and because it is unprecedented to use a heterologous comparator virus (YF vaccine) in a regulatory-enabling study. This approach may have value in future studies of other novel viral vectors.

Indexed as

Henipavirus InfectionsVesicular StomatitisViral VaccinesAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalEbola VaccinesGlycoproteinsHemorrhagic Fever, EbolaHumansMiceNipah VirusVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, SyntheticEbola VaccinesGlycoproteinsVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, SyntheticViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID35759511
PMCPMC9269911
OpenAlexW4283590984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.