Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35759489›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Brain predictors of fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis: A machine learning study.

María Goñi, Neil Basu, Alison D Murray, Gordon D Waiter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

María GoñiAberdeen Biomedical Imaging Centre (ABIC), Lilian Sutton Building, Foresterhill, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7897-2537
Neil BasuInstitute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Alison D MurrayAberdeen Biomedical Imaging Centre (ABIC), Lilian Sutton Building, Foresterhill, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Gordon D WaiterAberdeen Biomedical Imaging Centre (ABIC), Lilian Sutton Building, Foresterhill, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5313-9845
University of Aberdeen · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFatigue is a common and burdensome symptom in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), yet is poorly understood. Currently, clinicians rely solely on fatigue questionnaires, which are inherently subjective measures. For the effective development of future therapies and stratification, it is of vital importance to identify biomarkers of fatigue. In this study, we identify brain differences between RA patients who improved and did not improve their levels of fatigue based on Chalder Fatigue Scale variation (ΔCFS≥ 2), and we compared the performance of different classifiers to distinguish between these samples at baseline.

methodsFifty-four fatigued RA patients underwent a magnetic resonance (MR) scan at baseline and 6 months later. At 6 months we identified those whose fatigue levels improved and those for whom it did not. More than 900 brain features across three data sets were assessed as potential predictors of fatigue improvement. These data sets included clinical, structural MRI (sMRI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data. A genetic algorithm was used for feature selection. Three classifiers were employed in the discrimination of improvers and non-improvers of fatigue: a Least Square Linear Discriminant (LSLD), a linear Support Vector Machine (SVM) and a SVM with Radial Basis Function kernel.

resultsThe highest accuracy (67.9%) was achieved with the sMRI set, followed by the DTI set (63.8%), whereas classification performance using clinical features was at the chance level. The mean curvature of the left superior temporal sulcus was most strongly selected during the feature selection step, followed by the surface are of the right frontal pole and the surface area of the left banks of the superior temporal sulcus.

conclusionsThe results presented evidence a superiority of brain metrics over clinical metrics in predicting fatigue changes. Further exploration of these methods may support clinicians to triage patients towards the most appropriate fatigue alleviating therapies.

Indexed as

Arthritis, RheumatoidDiffusion Tensor ImagingBrainFatigueHumansMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID35759489
PMCPMC9236264
OpenAlexW4283591857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.