Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35759409›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of surgery2022

Severity of oEsophageal Anastomotic Leak in patients after oesophagectomy: the SEAL score.

Sander Ubels, Moniek Verstegen, Bastiaan Klarenbeek, Stefan Bouwense, Mark van Berge Henegouwen, Freek Daams, Marc J van Det, Ewen A Griffiths, Jan W Haveman, Joos Heisterkamp and 10 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Management of anastomotic leak after elective anterior resection for rectal cancer: A systematic review and pooled analysis.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Treatment of anastomotic leakage following Ivor Lewis esophagectomy-10 year experience from a Nordic center.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Predicting mortality in patients with anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: development of a prediction model using data from the TENTACLE-Esophagus study.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 12 institutions in 3 countries.

Sander UbelsDepartment of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9649-5436
Moniek VerstegenDepartment of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8371-509X
Bastiaan KlarenbeekDepartment of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2178-8557
Stefan BouwenseDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Mark van Berge HenegouwenDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8689-3134
Freek DaamsDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Marc J van DetDepartment of Surgery, ZGT hospital group, Almelo, the Netherlands.
Ewen A GriffithsDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6630-3547
Jan W HavemanDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Joos HeisterkampDepartment of Surgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Renol KoshyDepartment of Surgery, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospital NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Grard NieuwenhuijzenDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5837-5513
Fatih PolatDepartment of Surgery, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Peter D SiersemaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Pritam SinghDepartment of Surgery, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Bas WijnhovenDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Gerjon HanninkDepartment of Operating Rooms, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Frans van WorkumDepartment of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0623-9066
Camiel RosmanDepartment of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9152-3987
TENTACLE—Esophagus Collaborative Group
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBErasmus University Rotterdam · NLElisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis · NLZiekenhuis Groep Twente · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLCanisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis · NLCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust · GBUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

Medtronic
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnastomotic leak (AL) is a common but severe complication after oesophagectomy. It is unknown how to determine the severity of AL objectively at diagnosis. Determining leak severity may guide treatment decisions and improve future research. This study aimed to identify leak-related prognostic factors for mortality, and to develop a Severity of oEsophageal Anastomotic Leak (SEAL) score.

methodsThis international, retrospective cohort study in 71 centres worldwide included patients with AL after oesophagectomy between 2011 and 2019. The primary endpoint was 90-day mortality. Leak-related prognostic factors were identified after adjusting for confounders and were included in multivariable logistic regression to develop the SEAL score. Four classes of leak severity (mild, moderate, severe, and critical) were defined based on the risk of 90-day mortality, and the score was validated internally.

resultsSome 1509 patients with AL were included and the 90-day mortality rate was 11.7 per cent. Twelve leak-related prognostic factors were included in the SEAL score. The score showed good calibration and discrimination (c-index 0.77, 95 per cent c.i. 0.73 to 0.81). Higher classes of leak severity graded by the SEAL score were associated with a significant increase in duration of ICU stay, healing time, Comprehensive Complication Index score, and Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group classification.

conclusionThe SEAL score grades leak severity into four classes by combining 12 leak-related predictors and can be used to the assess severity of AL after oesophagectomy.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyAnastomosis, SurgicalAnastomotic LeakHumansLogistic ModelsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35759409
PMCPMC10364775
OpenAlexW4283654142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.