Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35759325›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of psychotraumatology2022

Introduction and evaluation of a therapeutic adherence and competence scale for grief-focused cognitive behavioural therapy.

Julia Haneveld, Rita Rosner, Anna Vogel, Svenja Mäkitalo, Julia Treml, Regina Steil, Winfried Rief, Hannah Comtesse

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of psychotraumatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Julia HaneveldDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University Eichstaett-Ingolstadt, Ingolstadt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3030-6145
Rita RosnerDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University Eichstaett-Ingolstadt, Ingolstadt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7960-8398
Anna VogelDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University Eichstaett-Ingolstadt, Ingolstadt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9035-7588
Svenja MäkitaloDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University Eichstaett-Ingolstadt, Ingolstadt, Germany.
Julia TremlDepartment für Psychische Gesundheit, Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1756-5425
Regina SteilGoethe Universität Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5367-5664
Winfried RiefUniversität Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7019-2250
Hannah ComtesseDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University Eichstaett-Ingolstadt, Ingolstadt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4150-6107
Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie · DEPhilipps University of Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is no therapeutic competence and adherence scale for grief-focused cognitive behavioural therapy (grief-focused CBT). However, given the growing body of evidence for the efficacy of grief-focused CBT, such a scale is needed both to ensure the internal validity of clinical trials and to facilitate psychotherapy process research. Objective: To develop and undertake a psychometric evaluation of a therapeutic adherence and competence scale for grief-focused CBT. Method: The scale was developed in two steps. (I) Five experts on the treatment of prolonged grief disorder provided feedback on the relevance and appropriateness of the items. The scale was revised to reflect their feedback. The final therapeutic adherence and competence scale for grief (TACs-G) consisted of 15 adherence and 16 competence items. (II) Psychometric evaluation of the TACs-G was based on the rating of 48 randomly selected PG-CBT sessions by two independent raters. The videos were recorded in the context of a randomized controlled trial (RCT; DRKS00012317.) ICC was used to calculate inter-rater reliability and TACs-G stability over time (re-evaluation of 10 sessions after 12 months). Results: The five experts confirmed the relevance and appropriateness of the items. Interrater reliability was found to be high for the total adherence and competence scores (ICC = 0.889 and 0.782, respectively) and moderate to excellent for individual items (ICC = 0.509-1.00). The TACs-G stability over time was found to be strong for both adherence (ICC = 0.970) and competence total scores (ICC = 0.965). Conclusions: The TACs-G for CBT is a reliable instrument that can be used not only to ensure internal validity but is also suited for psychotherapy process studies. Additionally, it provides a valuable database for targeted feedback in training settings. HIGHLIGHTS: This is the first study to report on the development and psychometrical evaluation of a grief-focused adherence and competence scale.Although an increasing number of clinical trials do report the efficacy of grief-focused cognitive-behavioural therapy, none of these studies used a standardized adherence and competence scale to control internal validity.In the present study, we introduced a therapeutic adherence and competence scale for grief (TACs-G) that can be applied efficiently across different research settings (e.g. manipulation check, dissemination), and report results of good to excellent psychometric properties.The scale itself could prove useful beyond the research setting as it could possibly serve as a basis for feedback in training settings.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyGriefHumansPsychometricsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReproducibility of ResultsTreatment Adherence and ComplianceCBTprolonged grief disorderTherapeutic adherencetherapeutic competencetreatment integrity

Identifiers

PMID35759325
PMCPMC9225790
OpenAlexW4282969937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.