ArticleImmunity, inflammation and disease2022
Trends of adverse events and mortality after DMARDs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Interrupted time-series analysis.
Article in Immunity, inflammation and disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cancer publications using real-world data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database: Conceptual framework and bibliometric analysis.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2025Article
- Sauna therapy in rheumatic diseases: mechanisms, potential benefits, and cautions.Rheumatology international · 2025Review
- Antioxidant Therapies as Emerging Adjuncts in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Targeting Oxidative Stress to Enhance Treatment Outcomes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Hypoxia with or without Treadmill Exercises Affects Slow-Twitch Muscle Atrophy and Joint Destruction in a Rat Model of Rheumatoid Arthritis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Trends of adverse events and mortality after DMARDs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Interrupted time-series analysis.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesPatients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) experience adverse events because of the characteristics of the disease and the side effects of medications. We investigated the trends of adverse events and mortality associated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs).
methodsWe used the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database to enroll patients with incident RA between 2000 and 2017. The 1-year incident rate of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding and 3-year incident rates of other adverse events and mortality for each calendar-quarter cohort were computed and adjusted using propensity score-based stabilized weights for fair comparisons. Levels and trends of the conventional DMARD era (2000-2002, Phase 1) were compared with those of the TNFi era (2003-2012, Phase 2) and OMA era (2013-2017, Phase 3) by using interrupted time series (ITS) analysis.
resultsAll patients with RA were prescribed cDMARDs in Phase 1 (2000-2002), and 1%-3% were prescribed either TNFi in phase 2 (2003-2012) or OMAs in phase 3 (2013-2017). The cancer incidence rate was 1.90%, and its mortality rate was 4.19%. After the introduction of TNFi from 2003 to 2012, the main outcomes, except TKA, exhibited a steady or mild decrease in trends. ITS analysis revealed that the slope mildly increased in 2003-2012 compared with that in 2000-2003 by 0.13% for total knee replacement (p = .0322). In 2012-2017 (the OMA era), the events became steady.
conclusionIn patients with RA, the introduction of DMARDs was associated with stable adverse events and mortality rates. Moreover, the introduced new treatment for RA exhibited a good safety profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.