Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35759169›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2022

Titin-related Cardiomyopathy: Is it a Distinct Disease?

Celine F Santiago, Inken G Huttner, Diane Fatkin

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Celine F SantiagoMolecular Cardiology and Biophysics Division, Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.
Inken G HuttnerMolecular Cardiology and Biophysics Division, Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.
Diane FatkinMolecular Cardiology and Biophysics Division, Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia. d.fatkin@victorchang.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9010-9856
Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTruncating TTN variants (TTNtv) are the most common genetic cause of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), but the underlying mechanisms are incompletely understood and effective therapeutic strategies are lacking. Here we review recent data that shed new light on the functional consequences of TTNtv and how these effects may vary with mutation location. RECENT

findingsWhether TTNtv act by haploinsufficiency or dominant negative effects has been hotly debated. New evidence now implicates both mechanisms in TTNtv-related DCM, showing reduced titin content and persistent truncated titin that may be incorporated into protein aggregates. The extent to which aggregate formation and protein quality control defects differ with TTNtv location and contribute to contractile dysfunction is unresolved. TTNtv-associated DCM has a complex etiology that involves varying combinations of wild-type titin deficiency and dominant negative effects of truncated mutant titin. Therapeutic strategies to improve protein handling may be beneficial in some cases.

Indexed as

CardiomyopathiesCardiomyopathy, DilatedConnectinHumansMutationConnectinDilated cardiomyopathyDisease mechanismsPersonalised medicineTitin truncation

Identifiers

PMID35759169
OpenAlexW4283583556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.