Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35759109›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2022

Laparoscopic gynecological surgery under minimally invasive anesthesia: a prospective cohort study.

Pierluigi Giampaolino, Luigi Della Corte, Antonio Mercorio, Dario Bruzzese, Antonio Coviello, Giovanna Grasso, Anna Claudia Del Piano, Giuseppe Bifulco

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pierluigi GiampaolinoDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Luigi Della CorteDepartment of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Antonio MercorioDepartment of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy. antoniomercorio@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2113-7706
Dario BruzzeseDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Antonio CovielloDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Policlinico - Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Giovanna GrassoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Policlinico - Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Anna Claudia Del PianoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Policlinico - Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Giuseppe BifulcoDepartment of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Federico II University Hospital · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility and the perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic gynecological surgery in regional anesthesia (RA) from the point of view of the surgeon, anesthesiologist and patient. This is a prospective cohort study comprising sixty-six women planned to undergo gynecologic laparoscopy surgery for benign pathology at tertiary care gynecolgical center of the University Federico II of Naples. Women were assigned, according to their preference, to either RA (Group A) or general anesthesia (GA) (Group B). Surgical, anesthesiologic and postoperative recovery data were recorded. Postoperative pain was considered as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included mobilization, length of hospital stay, global surgeons and patient satisfaction, intraoperative pain assessment in Group A. Immediate postoperative pain was significantly lower in Group A 0 vs 2 (p < 0.001), with no significant differences at 24 h. The secondary outcome demonstrated early patient's mobilization (p < 0.001) as well as early discharge (p < 0.001) and greater patient's satisfaction for the Group A. In these patients, a maximum pain score of 3 points out of 5 was recorded through the entire surgery. RA showed to decrease the impact of surgical stress and to guarantee a quicker recovery without compromising surgical results. Although several surgical approaches can be employed to treat different conditions, RA technique could be a viable option for well-selected patients affected by gynecological diseases.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaLaparoscopyFemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansPostoperative PainProspective StudiesGynecological surgeryPostoperative painRegional analgesia

Identifiers

PMID35759109
PMCPMC9244282
OpenAlexW4283583052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.