Observational studyJournal of neurology2022
Early use of fingolimod is associated with better clinical outcomes in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients.
Observational study in Journal of neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Demyelination to Intervention: Natural Compounds as Emerging Therapeutic Targets in Multiple Sclerosis Neuroinflammation.Journal of immunology research · 2026Review
- Comparative Effectiveness of Cladribine and S1P Receptor Modulators in Treatment-Naive Relapsing-Remitting MS.JAMA network open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMultiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune disease with huge heterogeneity in terms of clinical course, disease severity and treatment response. The need for a tailored treatment approach has emerged over the last few years. The present observational study aims to assess fingolimod (FTY) effectiveness in RRMS patients, stratifying them according to the disease-modifying treatments used before FTY, to identify subjects who could benefit more from this treatment.
methodsWe prospectively included 554 RRMS patients who started FTY at San Raffaele Hospital between 2012 and 2018. We classified them into three categories according to previous treatments: naïve patients, subjects previously treated with first-line drugs, and patients previously treated with second-line drugs. We compared disease activity during a 2-years follow-up using No-Evidence-of-Disease-Activity (NEDA-3) and Time-To-First-Relapse (TTFR) outcomes, applying logistic and Cox proportional hazard regression respectively.
resultsThe proportion of patients who maintained NEDA-3 status was higher in the naïve group despite a higher level of baseline disease activity (naïve versus first-line p = 0.025, naïve versus second-line p < 0.001). In the multivariable analyses, patients switching to FTY from first- and second-line treatments showed a higher risk of disease reactivation (p = 0.041, OR = 1.86 and p = 0.002, OR = 2.92, respectively) and a shorter TTFR (p = 0.017, HR = 4.35 and p = 0.001, HR = 8.19, respectively).
conclusionNaïve patients showed a better response to FTY compared to patients switching to FTY from other drugs. Our findings support the early use of FTY in patients with active MS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35759013What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.