Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35758811›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2022

Scaling multi-instance support vector machine to breast cancer detection on the BreaKHis dataset.

Hoon Seo, Lodewijk Brand, Lucia Saldana Barco, Hua Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hoon SeoDepartment of Computer Science, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401, USA.
Lodewijk BrandDepartment of Computer Science, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401, USA.
Lucia Saldana BarcoDepartment of Computer Science, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401, USA.
Hua WangDepartment of Computer Science, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationBreast cancer is a type of cancer that develops in breast tissues, and, after skin cancer, it is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women in the United States. Given that an early diagnosis is imperative to prevent breast cancer progression, many machine learning models have been developed in recent years to automate the histopathological classification of the different types of carcinomas. However, many of them are not scalable to large-scale datasets.

resultsIn this study, we propose the novel Primal-Dual Multi-Instance Support Vector Machine to determine which tissue segments in an image exhibit an indication of an abnormality. We derive an efficient optimization algorithm for the proposed objective by bypassing the quadratic programming and least-squares problems, which are commonly employed to optimize Support Vector Machine models. The proposed method is computationally efficient, thereby it is scalable to large-scale datasets. We applied our method to the public BreaKHis dataset and achieved promising prediction performance and scalability for histopathological classification. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Software is publicly available at: https://1drv.ms/u/s!AiFpD21bgf2wgRLbQq08ixD0SgRD?e=OpqEmY. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsSupport Vector MachineAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMachine LearningSoftware

Identifiers

PMID35758811
PMCPMC9235475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.