Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35758805›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2022

Quintet Rooting: rooting species trees under the multi-species coalescent model.

Yasamin Tabatabaee, Kowshika Sarker, Tandy Warnow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Phylogenomic branch length estimation using quartets.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yasamin TabatabaeeDepartment of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Kowshika SarkerDepartment of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Tandy WarnowDepartment of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7717-3514

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationRooted species trees are a basic model with multiple applications throughout biology, including understanding adaptation, biodiversity, phylogeography and co-evolution. Because most species tree estimation methods produce unrooted trees, methods for rooting these trees have been developed. However, most rooting methods either rely on prior biological knowledge or assume that evolution is close to clock-like, which is not usually the case. Furthermore, most prior rooting methods do not account for biological processes that create discordance between gene trees and species trees.

resultsWe present Quintet Rooting (QR), a method for rooting species trees based on a proof of identifiability of the rooted species tree under the multi-species coalescent model established by Allman, Degnan and Rhodes (J. Math. Biol., 2011). We show that QR is generally more accurate than other rooting methods, except under extreme levels of gene tree estimation error. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Quintet Rooting is available in open source form at https://github.com/ytabatabaee/Quintet-Rooting. The simulated datasets used in this study are from a prior study and are available at https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/55319. The biological dataset used in this study is also from a prior study and is available at http://gigadb.org/dataset/101041. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, GeneticPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID35758805
PMCPMC9236578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.