ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2022
Self-supervised learning of cell type specificity from immunohistochemical images.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Time for a full digital approach in nephropathology: a systematic review of current artificial intelligence applications and future directions.Journal of nephrology · 2024Pooled it
- Spotlight on challenges and novel methods in highly multiplexed tissue imaging-based spatial proteomics.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Cellular data extraction from multiplexed brain imaging data using self-supervised Dual-loss Adaptive Masked Autoencoder.Artificial intelligence in medicine · 2024Article
- Iterative pseudo balancing for stem cell microscopy image classification.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Overview of methods for characterization and visualization of a protein-protein interaction network in a multi-omics integration context.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationAdvances in bioimaging now permit in situ proteomic characterization of cell-cell interactions in complex tissues, with important applications across a spectrum of biological problems from development to disease. These methods depend on selection of antibodies targeting proteins that are expressed specifically in particular cell types. Candidate marker proteins are often identified from single-cell transcriptomic data, with variable rates of success, in part due to divergence between expression levels of proteins and the genes that encode them. In principle, marker identification could be improved by using existing databases of immunohistochemistry for thousands of antibodies in human tissue, such as the Human Protein Atlas. However, these data lack detailed annotations of the types of cells in each image.
resultsWe develop a method to predict cell type specificity of protein markers from unlabeled images. We train a convolutional neural network with a self-supervised objective to generate embeddings of the images. Using non-linear dimensionality reduction, we observe that the model clusters images according to cell types and anatomical regions for which the stained proteins are specific. We then use estimates of cell type specificity derived from an independent single-cell transcriptomics dataset to train an image classifier, without requiring any human labelling of images. Our scheme demonstrates superior classification of known proteomic markers in kidney compared to selection via single-cell transcriptomics. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Code and trained model are available at www.github.com/murphy17/HPA-SimCLR. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.