Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35758792›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2022

PhyloPGM: boosting regulatory function prediction accuracy using evolutionary information.

Faizy Ahsan, Zichao Yan, Doina Precup, Mathieu Blanchette

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Faizy AhsanSchool of Computer Science, McGill University, Montreal H3A 0G4, Canada.
Zichao YanSchool of Computer Science, McGill University, Montreal H3A 0G4, Canada.
Doina PrecupSchool of Computer Science, McGill University, Montreal H3A 0G4, Canada.
Mathieu BlanchetteSchool of Computer Science, McGill University, Montreal H3A 0G4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9555-860X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationThe computational prediction of regulatory function associated with a genomic sequence is of utter importance in -omics study, which facilitates our understanding of the underlying mechanisms underpinning the vast gene regulatory network. Prominent examples in this area include the binding prediction of transcription factors in DNA regulatory regions, and predicting RNA-protein interaction in the context of post-transcriptional gene expression. However, existing computational methods have suffered from high false-positive rates and have seldom used any evolutionary information, despite the vast amount of available orthologous data across multitudes of extant and ancestral genomes, which readily present an opportunity to improve the accuracy of existing computational methods.

resultsIn this study, we present a novel probabilistic approach called PhyloPGM that leverages previously trained TFBS or RNA-RBP binding predictors by aggregating their predictions from various orthologous regions, in order to boost the overall prediction accuracy on human sequences. Throughout our experiments, PhyloPGM has shown significant improvement over baselines such as the sequence-based RNA-RBP binding predictor RNATracker and the sequence-based TFBS predictor that is known as FactorNet. PhyloPGM is simple in principle, easy to implement and yet, yields impressive results. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The PhyloPGM package is available at https://github.com/BlanchetteLab/PhyloPGM. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

GenomicsRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidDNAHumansRNASequence Analysis, DNADNARNA

Identifiers

PMID35758792
PMCPMC9235490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.