ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2022
Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-World Use of Cefiderocol for Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Infections in Critically Ill ICU Patients: A Single-Center Case Series.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Cefiderocol Is Effective In Vitro Against Numerous Gram-Negative Species Isolated from Keratitis Patients.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Investigational antibiotic cefepime/zidebactam as a therapeutic option for the treatment of an unyielding empyema in a paediatric patient caused by extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a case report.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025Article
- In-vitro activity of the novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations and cefiderocol against carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas spp. clinical isolates collected in Switzerland in 2022.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025Article
- Comparison of Different Methods for Assaying the In Vitro Activity of Cefiderocol against Carbapenem-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Global Resistance of Imipenem/Relebactam against Gram-Negative Bacilli: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental · 2024Review
- Article
- Treatment of critically ill patients with cefiderocol for infections caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens: review of the evidence.Annals of intensive care · 2023Review
- Machine Learning Techniques for Antimicrobial Resistance Prediction ofComputational intelligence and neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cefiderocol was evaluated by broth microdilution versus 1,050 highly antimicrobial-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates from the CANWARD study (2007 to 2019). Overall, 98.3% of isolates remained cefiderocol susceptible (MIC, ≤4 μg/mL), including 97.4% of extensively drug-resistant (XDR) (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.