ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2022
Clinical Significance of BD Bactec FX Blood Culture Incubation Beyond 96 Hours (4 Days).
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Laboratory diagnosis of brucellosis: evolving synergy between serological testing and next-generation sequencing.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Review
- [Clinical value of cerebrospinal fluid metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of neonatal intracranial infection].Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2026Observational
- Review
- Fast Track Diagnostic Tools for Clinical Management of Sepsis: Paradigm Shift from Conventional to Advanced Methods.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Use of nares swab to de-escalate vancomycin for patients with suspected methicillin-resistantAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blood cultures (BC) for bacteria and yeast have traditionally been incubated for 5 days using modern instruments. Many organisms may grow sooner, and the need for the full 5-day incubation period has been questioned. This study evaluated the clinical significance of isolates recovered beyond 96 h. A retrospective chart review was conducted on all positive BC (+BC) performed via BD Bactec FX with >96 h of incubation from 5/2019 to 1/2022 at the UW Health University Hospital clinical microbiology laboratory. A total of 59,958 BC were performed; 6,031 (10%) were +BC. Of +BC, 104 (2%) demonstrated growth >96 h. The 104 cultures were from 89 patients and included 12 (12%) Staphylococcus aureus (1 MRSA), 9 (9%) yeast (8
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.