Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35758628›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie2022

Accuracy of genomic prediction of maternal traits in pigs using Bayesian variable selection methods.

Maria V Kjetså, Arne B Gjuvsland, Øyvind Nordbø, Eli Grindflek, Theo Meuwissen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Accuracy of genomic prediction of maternal traits in pigs using Bayesian variable selection methods.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maria V KjetsåNorwegian University of Life Sciences, Faculty of Biosciences, Ås, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8018-9872
Arne B GjuvslandNorsvin SA, Hamar, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4391-3411
Øyvind NordbøNorsvin SA, Hamar, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7000-1055
Eli GrindflekNorsvin SA, Hamar, Norway.
Theo MeuwissenNorwegian University of Life Sciences, Faculty of Biosciences, Ås, Norway.
Norsvin (Norway) · NONorwegian University of Life Sciences · NO

Funding

Norges Forskningsråd 255297
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare three methods of genomic prediction: GBLUP, BayesC and BayesGC for genomic prediction of six maternal traits in Landrace sows using a panel of 660 K SNPs. The effects of different priors for the Bayesian methods were also investigated. GBLUP does not take the genetic architecture into account as all SNPs are assumed to have equally sized effects and relies heavily on the relationships between the animals for accurate predictions. Bayesian approaches rely on both fitting SNPs that describe relationships between animals in addition to fitting single SNP effects directly. Both the relationship between the animals and single SNP effects are important for accurate predictions. Maternal traits in sows are often more difficult to record and have lower heritabilities. BayesGC was generally the method with the higher accuracy, although its accuracy was for some traits matched by that of GBLUP and for others by that of BayesC. For piglet mortality within 3 weeks, BayesGC achieved up to 9.2% higher accuracy. For many of the traits, however, the methods did not show significant differences in accuracies.

Indexed as

GenomeGenomicsAnimalsBayes TheoremFemaleGenotypeModels, GeneticPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideSwineBayesian genomic predictiongenomic prediction accuracygenomic selectionmaternal traits

Identifiers

PMID35758628
PMCPMC9796620
OpenAlexW4283575345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.