Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35758514›Full record

ArticleActa dermato-venereologica2022

Ability to Predict Melanoma Within 5 Years Using Registry Data and a Convolutional Neural Network: A Proof of Concept Study.

Martin Gillstedt, Sam Polesie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta dermato-venereologica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Machine learning in healthcare citizen science: A scoping review.International journal of medical informatics · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martin Gillstedt
Sam PolesieDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, SE-413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden. sam.polesie@vgregion.se.
University of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research relating to machine learning algorithms, including convolutional neural networks, has increased during the past 5 years. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate how accurately a convolutional neural network, trained on Swedish registry data, could perform in predicting cutaneous invasive and in situ melanoma (CMM) within 5 years. A cohort of 1,208,393 individuals was used. Registry data ranged from 4 July 2005 to 31 December 2011, predicting CMM between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2016. A convolutional neural network with one-dimensional convolutions with respect to time was trained using healthcare databases and registers. The algorithm was trained on 23,886 individuals. Validation was performed on a holdout validation set including 6,000 individuals. After training and validation, the convolutional neural network was evaluated on a test set (1,000 individuals with an CMM occurring within 5 years and 5,000 without). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.59 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.57-0.61). The point on the receiver-operating characteristic curve where sensitivity equalled specificity had a value of 56% (sensitivity 95% CI 53-60% and specificity 95% CI 55-58%). Albeit at an early stage, this pilot investigation demonstrates potential usefulness for machine learning algorithms in predicting melanoma risk.

Indexed as

MelanomaNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsHumansPilot ProjectsProof of Concept StudyRegistries

Identifiers

PMID35758514
PMCPMC9574684
OpenAlexW4283652012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.