Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35758185›Full record

ReviewHistopathology2022

WHO Classification of Tumours fifth edition: evolving issues in the classification, diagnosis, and prognostication of prostate cancer.

James G Kench, Mahul B Amin, Daniel M Berney, Eva M Compérat, Ian A Cree, Anthony J Gill, Arndt Hartmann, Santosh Menon, Holger Moch, George J Netto and 8 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Histopathology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Role of NOncology reports · 2024
    Review
  18. Treatment-induced neuroendocrine prostate cancer andWorld journal of clinical cases · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

James G KenchDepartment of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, NSW Health Pathology, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8687-4988
Mahul B AminThe University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
Daniel M BerneyDepartment of Cellular Pathology, Bartshealth NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, London, UK.
Eva M CompératDepartment of Pathology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8488-543X
Ian A CreeInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5007-9456
Anthony J GillThe University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Arndt HartmannInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Santosh MenonDepartment of Pathology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Holger MochDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
George J NettoHeersink School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Maria R RaspolliniHistopathology and Molecular Diagnostics, University Hospital Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Mark A RubinDepartment for BioMedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Puay Hoon TanDivision of Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1052-8605
Toyonori TsuzukiDepartment of Surgical Pathology, Aichi Medical University Hospital, Nagakute, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4855-4366
Samra TurjalicSkin and Renal Units, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Theo H van der KwastDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ming ZhouPathology and Laboratory Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
John R SrigleyDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fifth edition of the WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary and Male Genital Systems encompasses several updates to the classification and diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma as well as incorporating advancements in the assessment of its prognosis, including recent grading modifications. Some of the salient aspects include: (1) recognition that prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN)-like carcinoma is not synonymous with a pattern of ductal carcinoma, but better classified as a subtype of acinar adenocarcinoma; (2) a specific section on treatment-related neuroendocrine prostatic carcinoma in view of the tight correlation between androgen deprivation therapy and the development of prostatic carcinoma with neuroendocrine morphology, and the emerging data on lineage plasticity; (3) a terminology change of basal cell carcinoma to "adenoid cystic (basal cell) cell carcinoma" given the presence of an underlying MYB::NFIB gene fusion in many cases; (4) discussion of the current issues in the grading of acinar adenocarcinoma and the prognostic significance of cribriform growth patterns; and (5) more detailed coverage of intraductal carcinoma of prostate (IDC-P) reflecting our increased knowledge of this entity, while recommending the descriptive term atypical intraductal proliferation (AIP) for lesions falling short of IDC-P but containing more atypia than typically seen in high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN). Lesions previously regarded as cribriform patterns of HGPIN are now included in the AIP category. This review discusses these developments, summarising the existing literature, as well as the emerging morphological and molecular data that underpins the classification and prognostication of prostatic carcinoma.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, DuctalProstatic Intraepithelial NeoplasiaProstatic NeoplasmsAndrogen AntagonistsHumansMaleWorld Health OrganizationAndrogen Antagonistspathologyprostate carcinomaWHO Classification

Identifiers

PMID35758185
PMCPMC9542779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.