Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35757984›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2022

Care coordination, consistency and continuity: the case of the key worker role in children's cancer care.

Ana Martins, Susie Aldiss, Rachel M Taylor, Faith Gibson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Advancing oncology care excellence through timely, multidisciplinary-navigation models for non-palliative breast and colorectal cancer.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. End of life care in paediatric settings: UK national survey.BMJ supportive & palliative care · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ana MartinsUCLH Cancer Clinical Trials Unit, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.
Susie AldissGranger Building, University of SurreySchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health & Medical Sciences, Kate, Guildford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6015-6993
Rachel M TaylorCentre for Outcomes and Experience Research in Children's Health, Illness and Disability (ORCHID), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0853-0925
Faith GibsonGranger Building, University of SurreySchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health & Medical Sciences, Kate, Guildford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8125-4584

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe overall aim was to evaluate the key worker role across principal treatment centres for children with cancer in England, Wales and Scotland.

methodsMixed-methods case study gathering data from multiple perspectives using questionnaires, interviews, focus groups and reports/performance documents over a two-year period. Framework approach was adopted to analyse transcripts and documentary data.

resultsParticipants included: 22 nurse specialist key workers, 103 parents, 85 professionals and 10 children/young people. Qualitative and quantitative data were woven together, to best illuminate key worker services. Four main models of care were described as well as the context of care and process of care. Key working effectiveness centred around three pillars: care coordination; expert knowledge, experience and expertise; relationship. These were essential to improved family experience, emotional wellbeing, and delivery of individualized care closer to home.

conclusionsThe role is complex and diverse, responding to local needs. Certain conditions, (e.g., high caseload) placed limits on enacting the three pillars, diminishing the positive experience of families. When they worked well, key workers reduced the fragmented nature of services and families placed great value on keeping the same key worker from diagnosis into long-term care. Retaining these roles, where already in place, or including, if not, we would recommend, factoring into budgets to sustain and expand such roles.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsParentsAdolescentChildEnglandHumansLong-Term CareSurveys and Questionnairescancercare provisionchildrenevaluationKey workernurse specialistnursing

Identifiers

PMID35757984
PMCPMC9246033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.