Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35757883›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2022

A resilience sensing system for the biosphere.

Timothy M Lenton, Joshua E Buxton, David I Armstrong McKay, Jesse F Abrams, Chris A Boulton, Kirsten Lees, Thomas W R Powell, Niklas Boers, Andrew M Cunliffe, Vasilis Dakos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Ecological complexity and the biosphere: the next 30 years.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Timothy M LentonGlobal Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QE, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6725-7498
Joshua E BuxtonGlobal Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QE, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9664-0368
David I Armstrong McKayGlobal Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QE, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0020-7461
Jesse F AbramsGlobal Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QE, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0411-8519
Chris A BoultonGlobal Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QE, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7836-9391
Kirsten LeesGlobal Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QE, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9254-2103
Thomas W R PowellGlobal Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QE, UK.
Niklas BoersGlobal Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QE, UK.
Andrew M CunliffeGlobal Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QE, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8346-4278
Vasilis DakosISEM, University of Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8862-718X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We are in a climate and ecological emergency, where climate change and direct anthropogenic interference with the biosphere are risking abrupt and/or irreversible changes that threaten our life-support systems. Efforts are underway to increase the resilience of some ecosystems that are under threat, yet collective awareness and action are modest at best. Here, we highlight the potential for a biosphere resilience sensing system to make it easier to see where things are going wrong, and to see whether deliberate efforts to make things better are working. We focus on global resilience sensing of the terrestrial biosphere at high spatial and temporal resolution through satellite remote sensing, utilizing the generic mathematical behaviour of complex systems-loss of resilience corresponds to slower recovery from perturbations, gain of resilience equates to faster recovery. We consider what subset of biosphere resilience remote sensing can monitor, critically reviewing existing studies. Then we present illustrative, global results for vegetation resilience and trends in resilience over the last 20 years, from both satellite data and model simulations. We close by discussing how resilience sensing nested across global, biome-ecoregion, and local ecosystem scales could aid management and governance at these different scales, and identify priorities for further work. This article is part of the theme issue 'Ecological complexity and the biosphere: the next 30 years'.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeEcosystembiosphereclimate changeecosystemsrecovery rateremote sensingresilience

Identifiers

PMID35757883
PMCPMC9234808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.