Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35757873›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2022

Circling the drain: the extinction crisis and the future of humanity.

Rodolfo Dirzo, Gerardo Ceballos, Paul R Ehrlich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Best practices for the naming of species.Journal of mammalogy · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Underlying and proximate drivers of biodiversity changes in Mesoamerican biosphere reserves.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  12. What is extinction research?Cambridge prisms. Extinction · 2024
    Article
  13. PeerJ · 2024
    Article
  14. Russian Biodiversity Collections: A Professional Opinion Survey.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  15. Reimagining infrastructure for a biodiverse future.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  16. Mutilation of the tree of life via mass extinction of animal genera.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  17. Helminths in Invasive Raccoons (Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. A critical analysis of plant science literature reveals ongoing inequities.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  20. Ecological complexity and the biosphere: the next 30 years.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rodolfo DirzoDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5751-9888
Gerardo CeballosInstituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City 04510, Mexico.
Paul R EhrlichDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humanity has triggered the sixth mass extinction episode since the beginning of the Phanerozoic. The complexity of this extinction crisis is centred on the intersection of two complex adaptive systems: human culture and ecosystem functioning, although the significance of this intersection is not properly appreciated. Human beings are part of biodiversity and elements in a global ecosystem. Civilization, and perhaps even the fate of our species, is utterly dependent on that ecosystem's proper functioning, which society is increasingly degrading. The crisis seems rooted in three factors. First, relatively few people globally are aware of its existence. Second, most people who are, and even many scientists, assume incorrectly that the problem is primarily one of the disappearance of species, when it is the existential threat of myriad population extinctions. Third, while concerned scientists know there are many individual and collective steps that must be taken to slow population extinction rates, some are not willing to advocate the one fundamental, necessary, 'simple' cure, that is, reducing the scale of the human enterprise. We argue that compassionate shrinkage of the human population by further encouraging lower birth rates while reducing both inequity and aggregate wasteful consumption-that is, an end to growthmania-will be required. This article is part of the theme issue 'Ecological complexity and the biosphere: the next 30 years'.

Indexed as

EcosystemExtinction, BiologicalBiodiversityHumansamong-driver synergiescomplex adaptive systemshuman enterprisemass extinctionspopulation loss

Identifiers

PMID35757873
PMCPMC9237743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.