Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35757872›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2022

From coral reefs to Joshua trees: What ecological interactions teach us about the adaptive capacity of biodiversity in the Anthropocene.

Katherine M Lagerstrom, Summer Vance, Brendan H Cornwell, Megan Ruffley, Tatiana Bellagio, Moi Exposito-Alonso, Stephen R Palumbi, Elizabeth A Hadly

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Ecological complexity and the biosphere: the next 30 years.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Katherine M LagerstromDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8747-0544
Summer VanceDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Brendan H CornwellHopkins Marine Station of Stanford University, Pacific Grove, CA 93950, USA.
Megan RuffleyDepartment of Plant Biology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Tatiana BellagioDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Moi Exposito-AlonsoDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Stephen R PalumbiHopkins Marine Station of Stanford University, Pacific Grove, CA 93950, USA.
Elizabeth A HadlyDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pervasive loss of biodiversity in the Anthropocene necessitates rapid assessments of ecosystems to understand how they will respond to anthropogenic environmental change. Many studies have sought to describe the adaptive capacity (AC) of individual species, a measure that encompasses a species' ability to respond and adapt to change. Only those adaptive mechanisms that can be used over the next few decades (e.g. via novel interactions, behavioural changes, hybridization, migration, etc.) are relevant to the timescale set by the rapid changes of the Anthropocene. The impacts of species loss cascade through ecosystems, yet few studies integrate the capacity of ecological networks to adapt to change with the ACs of its species. Here, we discuss three ecosystems and how their ecological networks impact the AC of species and vice versa. A more holistic perspective that considers the AC of species with respect to their ecological interactions and functions will provide more predictive power and a deeper understanding of what factors are most important to a species' survival. We contend that the AC of a species, combined with its role in ecosystem function and stability, must guide decisions in assigning 'risk' and triaging biodiversity loss in the Anthropocene. This article is part of the theme issue 'Ecological complexity and the biosphere: the next 30 years'.

Indexed as

Coral ReefsEcosystemBiodiversityClimate ChangeTreesadaptive capacityAnthropocenebiodiversityecological interactions

Identifiers

PMID35757872
PMCPMC9234817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.