Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35757832›Full record

ArticleCurrent psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)2022

Validation of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for Detecting Depression Among Pregnant Women in Lima, Peru.

Meghan L Smith, Sixto E Sanchez, Marta Rondon, Jaimie L Gradus, Bizu Gelaye

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Risk Factors for Depression Among Middle-Aged to Older People Living With HIV in Lima, Peru.Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Meghan L SmithDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany St, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Sixto E SanchezInstituto de Investigación, Facultad deMedicina, Universidad de San Martin de Porres, Lima, Peru.
Marta RondonUniversidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Jaimie L GradusDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany St, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Bizu GelayeDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Boston University · USHarvard University · USUniversidad de San Martín de Porres · PEUniversidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia · PE

Funding

A Cohort Study of Preterm Delivery in Relation to Partner Abuse, Mood and AnxietyR01HD059835 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WILLIAMS, MICHELLE A. · 2010 to 2014
$2.8M
Characterizing Trauma Outcomes: From Pre-trauma Risk to Post-trauma SequelaeR01MH110453 · NIMH · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI GRADUS, JAIMIE L. · 2017 to 2020
$1.3M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD059835NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH110453
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Depression during pregnancy is linked to adverse perinatal and offspring outcomes. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) has been validated for identifying depression in pregnant women in limited cultural contexts. Construct validity and reliability have been assessed in Lima, Peru, but criterion validity has not. This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the PHQ-9 among pregnant Peruvian women in the Pregnancy Outcomes, Maternal and Infant Study (PrOMIS). Using Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) criteria for past-12-month major depressive disorder as the reference standard, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of the PHQ-9 for detecting depression were assessed at various cutpoints of the PHQ-9. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to evaluate one- and two-factor structures for the PHQ-9. Cronbach's alpha was computed for the entire PHQ-9 scale and for subscales supported by CFA. A cutpoint of ≥8 maximized combined sensitivity (61%) and specificity (62%). At this cutpoint, positive predictive value was low (15%) and negative predictive values was high (93%). Reliability for the full scale was high (α=0.80). Both one- and two-factor solutions were appropriate for this population, but a two-factor solution containing an affective/mood factor (α=0.67) and a somatic factor (α=0.75) was optimal (CFI=0.93, RMSEA=0.075). Among pregnant women in Lima, screening with the PHQ-9 can identify those in need of mental health care, but may identify a large number of false positive cases.

Indexed as

antepartum depressiondepressionmaternal healthPatient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)pregnancyscreeningvalidation

Identifiers

PMID35757832
PMCPMC9216168
OpenAlexW3040098615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.