Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35757682›Full record

ArticleInterdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases2022

Cross Protectivity Analysis of 49.8 kDa Pili Subunits of

Dwi Yuni Nur Hidayati, Septha Rully, Aisyah Amalia, Elsa Larissa Widyani, Genitri Indraswari, Adrian Prasetya, Merika Soraya, Sri Winarsih, Sumarno Reto Prawiro

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 61% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dwi Yuni Nur HidayatiDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6614-6016
Septha RullyMaster Program in Biomedical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2716-8992
Aisyah AmaliaMaster Program in Biomedical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0641-1778
Elsa Larissa WidyaniMaster Program in Biomedical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9106-8390
Genitri IndraswariMaster Program in Biomedical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8617-8747
Adrian PrasetyaMaster Program in Biomedical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4309-3537
Merika SorayaMaster Program in Biomedical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0992-1765
Sri WinarsihDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7476-9184
Sumarno Reto PrawiroDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9570-9631
University of Brawijaya · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although the AMV and AMS vaccine candidates have similar characteristics as hemagglutinin and adhesive molecules, there are differences in molecular weight. Objective: The research aims to determine the immunological cross-reaction between AMS and AMV. Method: Antihemagglutination test used the anti-adhesion molecular antibody AMS. Next, we examined the immune response that has to be linked with protectivity. The model of the research uses MLIL. The sample separated the mice into four groups, and each group had five mice. The first group was the negative control group. The second group was given AMV and infected with Results: An antihemagglutination cross immune response, intestinal weight, the number of bacterial colonies, and other findings were found to be significant ( Conclusion: The 49.8 kDa·MW protein subunit of the

Identifiers

PMID35757682
PMCPMC9217611
OpenAlexW4282968059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.