Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35757619›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in public health2022

Application of Serious Games in Health Care: Scoping Review and Bibliometric Analysis.

Yue Wang, Zhao Wang, Guoqing Liu, Zhangyi Wang, Qinglong Wang, Yishan Yan, Jing Wang, Yue Zhu, Weijie Gao, Xiangling Kan and 3 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisScoping Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Serious Games in Medical Education: What it Adds? How to Go about It?Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yue WangThe School of Graduate, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Zhao WangThe School of Graduate, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Guoqing LiuThe School of Graduate, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Zhangyi WangThe School of Graduate, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Qinglong WangNursing Department, Tianjin Medical University Chu Hisen-I Memorial Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Yishan YanThe School of Graduate, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Jing WangThe School of Graduate, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Yue ZhuThe School of Graduate, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Weijie GaoThe School of Nursing, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Xiangling KanDean's Office, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Zhiguo ZhangThe School of Graduate, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Lixia JiaDean's Office, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Xiaoli PangThe School of Nursing, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Serious games (SGs) as one kind of intervention that can improve the level of knowledge and change behavior to affect health outcomes has been increasingly applied in health care. Objective: Analyze hotspots and trends of the application of SGs in health care and provide reference and direction for further research in the future. Methods: The Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection database was used for extracting the literature on SGs in health care for the period from the database established to 11 October, 2021. Scoping review and bibliometric analysis were used to deeply analyze and visualize countries, categories of studies, annual study output, cited authors, cited journals, cited articles, and keywords of healthcare field. Results: A total of 1,322 articles were retrieved, then every articles' title and abstract were read one by one, and 795 articles were included after screening with an exponential increase in publication volume. The United States of America made the greatest contribution to global publications regarding SGs in health care. From the total, 20.8% of articles fall under the category of health care sciences services. The target groups were mainly concentrated in children (18.0%), youth (13.8%), the elderly (10.9%), adolescents (9.1%), and adults (3.4%). Baranowski T ( Conclusions: The application of SGs in health care remains important areas for future research. "Rehabilitation," "medical education," and "design" reflected the latest research hotpots and future trends.

Indexed as

BibliometricsBiomedical ResearchAdolescentAgedChildDatabases, FactualDelivery of Health CareHumansUnited Statesbibliometric analysiseducationhealth carerehabilitationscoping reviewserious games

Identifiers

PMID35757619
PMCPMC9231462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.