Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35757534›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022

Emotion Recognition With Knowledge Graph Based on Electrodermal Activity.

Hayford Perry Fordson, Xiaofen Xing, Kailing Guo, Xiangmin Xu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hayford Perry FordsonSchool of Electronic and Information Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaofen XingSchool of Electronic and Information Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Kailing GuoSchool of Electronic and Information Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Xiangmin XuSchool of Electronic and Information Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
South China University of Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrodermal activity (EDA) sensor is emerging non-invasive equipment in affect detection research, which is used to measure electrical activities of the skin. Knowledge graphs are an effective way to learn representation from data. However, few studies analyzed the effect of knowledge-related graph features with physiological signals when subjects are in non-similar mental states. In this paper, we propose a model using deep learning techniques to classify the emotional responses of individuals acquired from physiological datasets. We aim to improve the execution of emotion recognition based on EDA signals. The proposed framework is based on observed gender and age information as embedding feature vectors. We also extract time and frequency EDA features in line with cognitive studies. We then introduce a sophisticated weighted feature fusion method that combines knowledge embedding feature vectors and statistical feature (SF) vectors for emotional state classification. We finally utilize deep neural networks to optimize our approach. Results obtained indicated that the correct combination of Gender-Age Relation Graph (GARG) and SF vectors improve the performance of the valence-arousal emotion recognition system by 4 and 5% on PAFEW and 3 and 2% on DEAP datasets.

Indexed as

affective computingelectrodermal activityemotion recognitionknowledge graphMLP

Identifiers

PMID35757534
PMCPMC9220300
OpenAlexW4285739848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.