Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35757393›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in endocrinology2022

Low Luteal Serum Progesterone Levels Are Associated With Lower Ongoing Pregnancy and Live Birth Rates in ART: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.

Noemie Ranisavljevic, Stephanie Huberlant, Marie Montagut, Pierre-Marie Alonzo, Bernadette Darné, Solène Languille, Tal Anahory, Isabelle Cédrin-Durnerin

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Progesterone: The Key Factor of the Beginning of Life.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Noemie RanisavljevicDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) and University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Stephanie HuberlantDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Carémeau, Nîmes, France.
Marie MontagutCenter for Human Reproduction-Institut Francophone de Recherche Et d'études Appliquées à la Reproduction Et Sexologie (IFREARES), Clinique Saint Jean du Languedoc, Toulouse, France.
Pierre-Marie AlonzoGedeon Richter France, Paris, France.
Bernadette DarnéMonitoring Force, Maisons-Laffitte, France.
Solène LanguilleMonitoring Force, Maisons-Laffitte, France.
Tal AnahoryDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) and University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Isabelle Cédrin-DurnerinDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Hôpital Jean-Verdier, Bondy, France.
Maison des Sciences de l'Homme · FRUniversité de Montpellier · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes · FRHôpital Jean-Verdier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Progesterone plays a key role in implantation. Several studies reported that lower luteal progesterone levels might be related to decreased chances of pregnancy. This systematic review was conducted using appropriate key words, on MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, from 1990 up to March 2021 to assess if luteal serum progesterone levels are associated with ongoing pregnancy (OP) and live birth (LB) rates (primary outcomes) and miscarriage rate (secondary outcome), according to the number of corpora lutea (CLs). Overall 2,632 non-duplicate records were identified, of which 32 relevant studies were available for quantitative analysis. In artificial cycles with no CL, OP and LB rates were significantly decreased when the luteal progesterone level falls below a certain threshold (risk ratio [RR] 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62-0.84 and 0.73; 95% CI 0.59-0.90, respectively), while the miscarriage rate was increased (RR 1.48; 95% CI 1.17-1.86). In stimulated cycles with several CLs, the mean luteal progesterone level in the no OP and no LB groups was significantly lower than in the OP and LB groups [difference in means 68.8 (95% CI 45.6-92.0) and 272.4 (95% CI 10.8-533.9), ng/ml, respectively]. Monitoring luteal serum progesterone levels could help in individualizing progesterone administration to enhance OP and LB rates, especially in cycles without corpus luteum. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=139019, identifier 139019.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousProgesteroneBirth RateCorpus LuteumFemaleHumansLuteal PhasePregnancyPregnancy RateProgesteronecorpus luteumhormonal replacement therapyIVFlive birthluteal progesterone concentrationongoing pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID35757393
PMCPMC9229589
OpenAlexW4281656788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.