Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35757305›Full record

ArticleBuilding and environment2022

A population framework for predicting the proportion of people infected by the far-field airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 indoors.

Christopher Iddon, Benjamin Jones, Patrick Sharpe, Muge Cevik, Shaun Fitzgerald

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Building and environment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Non-pharmaceutical interventions for COVID-19: a systematic review on environmental control measures.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. The Wells-Riley Model Revisited II: Parameter Uncertainty and Population Heterogeneity.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher IddonDepartment of Architecture and Built Environment, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Benjamin JonesDepartment of Architecture and Built Environment, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Patrick SharpeDepartment of Architecture and Built Environment, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Muge CevikDepartment of Infection and Global Health, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.
Shaun FitzgeraldDepartment of Engineering, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.
University of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of St Andrews · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of occupants in a space influences the risk of far-field airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 because the likelihood of having infectious and susceptible people both correlate with the number of occupants. This paper explores the relationship between occupancy and the probability of infection, and how this affects an individual person and a population of people. Mass-balance and dose-response models determine far-field transmission risks for an individual person and a population of people after sub-dividing a large

Indexed as

AerosolsCOVID-19Relative exposure indexTransmission riskVentilationViral load

Identifiers

PMID35757305
PMCPMC9212805
OpenAlexW4283078258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.