Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35757160›Full record

ArticleCancer management and research2022

Gender Differences in Coping, Depression, and Anxiety in Patients with Non-Metastatic Lung Cancer.

Elisei Moise Hasan, Crenguta Livia Calma, Anca Tudor, Corina Vernic, Emanuel Palade, Emanuela Tudorache, Cristian Oancea, Ion Papava

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer management and research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The effect of cancer response style on anxiety and depression levels in newly diagnosed lung cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Elisei Moise Hasan"Victor Babeș" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timișoara, Romania.
Crenguta Livia CalmaDepartment of Functional Sciences, Center of Immuno-Physiology (CIFBIOTEH), "Victor Babeș" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timișoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-7304-9716
Anca TudorDepartment of Functional Sciences, "Victor Babeș" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timișoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-9630-4727
Corina VernicDepartment of Functional Sciences, "Victor Babeș" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timișoara, Romania.
Emanuel PaladeDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Emanuela TudoracheDepartment of Infectious Diseases, "Victor Babeș" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timișoara, Romania.
Cristian OanceaDepartment of Infectious Diseases, "Victor Babeș" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timișoara, Romania.
Ion PapavaDepartment of Neuroscience, NEUROPSY - COG Center for Cognitive Research in Neuropsychiatric Pathology, "Victor Babes," University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timișoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-0963-8222
Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara · ROIuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Depression and anxiety are prevalent issues amongst individuals suffering from thoracic cancer. Gender differences in coping with thoracic cancer have a serious impact upon the management of emotional distress. The purpose of our study has been to assess sex variations in handling anxiety and depression, including the use of coping mechanisms and their relationship with respect to anxiety and depression. Methods: This cross-sectional study registered 18 women and 22 men with non-metastatic lung cancer and operated upon. Pre-operatively and at one month post-operatively, the patients were assessed by means of scales (COPE, GAD-7 and PHQ-9). Results: Post-operatively, the intensity of depression and anxiety was substantially greater in males than in females (p = 0.049, p = 0.042). Male individuals tended to use coping mechanisms of humour (p = 0.009) and restraint (p = 0.029) significantly more frequently than women. Moreover, in women, depression correlated significantly with denial and behavioural deactivation (rho = 0.465, p = 0.029, respectively, rho = 0.562, p = 0.006); whilst anxiety, similarly, correlated with positive interpretation, behavioural deactivation, and use of social-emotional support (rho = 0.484, p = 0.022, respectively, rho = 0.590, p = 0.004 and rho = 0.502, p = 0.017). Furthermore, in males, depression correlated significantly with mental deactivation, use of social-instrumental and social-emotional support (rho = 0.702, p = 0.001, respectively, rho = 0.505, p=0.033, and rho = 0.773 with p < 0.001), whilst anxiety correlated significantly with mental deactivation, denial, and use of social-emotional support (rho = 0.597, p = 0.009, respectively, rho = 0.553 with p = 0.017 and rho = 0.755, p < 0.001). Conclusion: There were gender divergences in the use of coping mechanisms and the level of post-surgical anxiety and depression. We found significant positive relationships between some coping mechanisms and depression/anxiety. The patient's gender governs the coping style, which in turn has bearing upon the post-operative evolution.

Indexed as

anxietycopingdepressiongender differencesnon-metastatic lung cancer

Identifiers

PMID35757160
PMCPMC9231683
OpenAlexW4283157748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.