Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35757146›Full record

ReviewBiomicrofluidics2022

Emergence of debubblers in microfluidics: A critical review.

Mingpeng Yang, Nan Sun, Yong Luo, Xiaochen Lai, Peiru Li, Zhenyu Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomicrofluidics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Responsive Open Microfluidic Logic for Mechanical Computing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Aerophilic debubbling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Advancement of microchip electrophoresis coupled with capacitively coupled contactless conductivity detection-from design to application (2018-2024).Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Blood-Brain Barrier Breakdown in Neuroinflammation: Current In Vitro Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nan SunSchool of Automation, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China.
Yong Luo
Xiaochen Lai
Peiru LiSchool of Automation, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China.
Zhenyu ZhangSchool of Automation, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bubbles in microfluidics-even those that appear to be negligibly small-are pervasive and responsible for the failure of many biological and chemical experiments. For instance, they block current conduction, damage cell membranes, and interfere with detection results. To overcome this unavoidable and intractable problem, researchers have developed various methods for capturing and removing bubbles from microfluidics. Such methods are multifarious and their working principles are very different from each other. In this review, bubble-removing methods are divided into two broad categories: active debubblers (that require external auxiliary equipment) and passive debubblers (driven by natural processes). In each category, three main types of methods are discussed along with their advantages and disadvantages. Among the active debubblers, those assisted by lasers, acoustic generators, and negative pressure pumps are discussed. Among the passive debubblers, those driven by buoyancy, the characteristics of gas-liquid interfaces, and the hydrophilic and hydrophobic properties of materials are discussed. Finally, the challenges and prospects of the bubble-removal technologies are reviewed to refer researchers to microfluidics and inspire further investigations in this field.

Identifiers

PMID35757146
PMCPMC9217167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.