Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35757018›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2022

Corneal Topographic versus Manifest Refractive Astigmatism in Patients with Keratoconus: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.

Mohamed Elkadim, Mohamed H Nasef, Ahmed Roshdy Alagorie, Waleed A Allam

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06798779 (Predicting Manifest Astigmatism in Keratoconus Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06798779 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Predicting Manifest Astigmatism in Keratoconus Patients: A Machine Learning Approach Using Corneal Topography.

TypeobservationalSponsorRoyal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation TrustRan2024 to 2025Enrolled800ConditionsKeratoconus, Keratoconus, Artificial Intelligence, Support Vector MachineArmsGlasses, Corneal topography
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohamed ElkadimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Mohamed H NasefDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-8901-1803
Ahmed Roshdy AlagorieDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-5489-0617
Waleed A AllamDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-9666-9734
Tanta University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the subjective manifest astigmatism to the corneal topographic astigmatism in patients with keratoconus. Methods: This retrospective study included data of 230 keratoconic eyes of 115 patients. Topographic corneal astigmatism (TA), which was measured by pentacam, was compared and correlated to manifest refractive cylinder (MRC) in terms of power, axis, vector components, and mean vector. The difference between TA and MRC was correlated to the maximum keratometric reading (Kmax) and the thinnest pachymetry location (TL), as indicators of keratoconus severity. Results: There was a significant positive correlation between MRC power and TA power (p < 0.001; r = 0.58). TA power was significantly higher than MRC power (p < 0.001). A significant correlation was present between the axis of TA and MRC (r = 0.73; p < 0.001) with the axis of the MRC tending to be more vertical (more against the rule) than the axis of TA. The vector difference between TA and MRC is correlated to the Kmax (p < 0.001; r = 0.62) and TL (p < 0.001; r = 0.3). Conclusions: A significant difference is present between TA and MRC in keratoconic eyes, the power of MRC tends to be less and the axis tends to be more vertical than those of TA; this difference increases as keratoconus becomes more advanced.

Indexed as

keratoconuspentacamtomographic astigmatism

Identifiers

PMID35757018
PMCPMC9231632
OpenAlexW4283156588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.