ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2022
Regulation of Malignant Myeloid Leukemia by Mesenchymal Stem Cells.
Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Macrophage polarization in hematologic cancers: mechanisms and therapeutic strategies.Blood research · 2026Review
- MMP14 from BM-MSCs facilitates progression and Ara-C resistance in acute myeloid leukemia via the JAK/STAT pathway.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2025Article
- Damage of the Bone Marrow Stromal Precursors in Patients with Acute Leukemia at the Onset of the Disease and During Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Leukemic Stem Cells and Hematological Malignancies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Biology and Therapeutic Properties of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Leukemia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Review
- A novel therapeutic strategy: the significance of exosomal miRNAs in acute myeloid leukemia.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2024Review
- Mesenchymal stem cells-macrophages crosstalk and myeloid malignancy.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- BM-MSCs display altered gene expression profiles in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia niches and exert pro-proliferative effects via overexpression of IFI6.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Article
- Tumour‑derived exosomes and their emerging roles in leukaemia (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2023Review
- A potential area of use for immune checkpoint inhibitors: Targeting bone marrow microenvironment in acute myeloid leukemia.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone marrow microenvironment (BMM) has been proven to have benefits for both normal hematopoietic stem cell niche and pathological leukemic stem cell niche. In fact, the pathological leukemia microenvironment reprograms bone marrow niche cells, especially mesenchymal stem cells for leukemia progression, chemoresistance and relapse. The growth and differentiation of MSCs are modulated by leukemia stem cells. Moreover, chromatin abnormality of mesenchymal stem cells is sufficient for leukemia initiation. Here, we summarize the detailed relationship between MSC and leukemia. MSCs can actively and passively regulate the progression of myelogenous leukemia through cell-to-cell contact, cytokine-receptor interaction, and exosome communication. These behaviors benefit LSCs proliferation and survival and inhibit physiological hematopoiesis. Finally, we describe the recent advances in therapy targeting MSC hoping to provide new perspectives and therapeutic strategies for leukemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.