Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35756962›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient experience2022

Succinct Cancer Clinical Trial Consent Forms in Rural Patients With Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized, Double-Blinded study.

Jana Wieland, Daniel Satele, Yahya Almodallal, Paul Novotny, Stephanie L Pritzl, Sumithra J Mandrekar, Aminah Jatoi

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient experience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04548063 (Consent Forms in Cancer Research), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04548063 nacompletednot on this map

Consent Forms in Cancer Research: Examining the Effect of Length on Readability

TypeinterventionalSponsorMayo ClinicRan2020 to 2020Enrolled266ConditionsCancerArms6,000 word consent form, 4,000 word consent form, 2,000 word consent form
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jana WielandDepartment of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Daniel SateleDivision of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Yahya AlmodallalDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Paul NovotnyDivision of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Stephanie L PritzlDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Sumithra J MandrekarDivision of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Aminah JatoiDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1081-189X

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI AKHILESH PANDEY · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rural patients are often underrepresented in cancer clinical trials. This is a secondary analysis of a study that tested short (2000 word) versus long (6000 word) consent forms with a focus on rurality. Among 240 patients, 89 (37%) were rural. Seventy-one (80%) rural and 117 (77%) nonrural patients signed a consent form of any length (

Indexed as

brevityclinical trialseducationalshort consent formssuccinct

Identifiers

PMID35756962
PMCPMC9228630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.