ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022
A Prospective, Multicenter, Single-Group Target-Value Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of a Large Bore Aspiration Catheter System for the Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study was conducted to determine the safety and efficacy of the Esperance Methods: A prospective multicenter clinical trial involving 15 stroke centers was performed. Baseline characteristics, procedural data, and angiographic and clinical outcomes of all acute stroke procedures (from May 2020 to March 2021) using the novel large bore aspiration catheter were analyzed. Results: During the study period, 160 consecutive patients were recruited. The mean age and median baseline NIHSS were 65.4 years and 16, respectively. Successful reperfusion was achieved in 147 (91.9%) cases [at least modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 2b] with aspiration alone, with complete reperfusion (mTICI 3) in 94 (58.8%) cases. Successful/complete first pass reperfusion was achieved in 104 (64.60%) cases, including mTICI 2b in 34 (21.1%) cases and mTICI 3 in 70 (43.5%) cases. The time from groin puncture to successful reperfusion was 44 (33, 62) min. There were 16 (9.9%) cases requiring rescue therapy using stent-retriever. Procedure-related complications included 2 (1.3%) cases of arterial perforation, 2 (1.3%) cases of arterial dissection, 12 (7.5%) cases of distal embolization, and 1(0.6%) case of puncture site infection. The rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) was 3.8% and mortality rate was 13.8%. A total of 99 (62.3%) cases had a favorable outcome (mRS 0-2) at 90 days. Conclusions: In current practice, the first-line aspiration approach with the Esperance
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.