ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022
Machine Learning-Based Model for Prediction of Hemorrhage Transformation in Acute Ischemic Stroke After Alteplase.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Machine learning models of segmentation in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Pooled it
- Traditional and machine learning models for predicting haemorrhagic transformation in ischaemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Machine learning and deep learning algorithms in stroke medicine: a systematic review of hemorrhagic transformation prediction models.Journal of neurology · 2024Pooled it
- Predicting adverse drug event using machine learning based on electronic health records: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Risk prediction models for intracranial hemorrhage in acute ischemic stroke patients receiving intravenous alteplase treatment: a systematic review.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Pooled it
- Advanced Machine Learning Models for Predicting Post-Thrombolysis Hemorrhagic Transformation in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisPooled it
- Development of a prediction model for hemorrhagic transformation after intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a retrospective analysis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Constructing machine learning models based on non-contrast CT radiomics to predict hemorrhagic transformation after stoke: a two-center study.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Circulating miRNA profiles and the risk of hemorrhagic transformation after thrombolytic treatment of acute ischemic stroke: a pilot study.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- The HALP (hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet) score is associated with hemorrhagic transformation after intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Development and validation of an explainable machine learning prediction model of hemorrhagic transformation after intravenous thrombolysis in stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- A weakly supervised deep learning model integrating noncontrasted computed tomography images and clinical factors facilitates haemorrhagic transformation prediction after intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke patients.Biomedical engineering online · 2023Article
- Application and risk prediction of thrombolytic therapy in cardio-cerebrovascular diseases: a review.Thrombosis journal · 2023Article
- Machine Learning Models for Predicting Early Neurological Deterioration and Risk Classification of Acute Ischemic Stroke.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisArticle
- Interpretable machine learning for predicting 30-day mortality following intracranial hemorrhage surgery.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hemorrhage transformation (HT) is the most dreaded complication of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). The prediction of HT after IVT is important in the treatment decision-making for AIS. We designed and compared different machine learning methods, capable of predicting HT in AIS after IVT. A total of 345 AIS patients who received intravenous alteplase between January 2016 and June 2021 were enrolled in this retrospective study. The demographic characteristics, clinical condition, biochemical data, and neuroimaging variables were included for analysis. HT was confirmed by head computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within 48 h after IVT. Based on the neuroimaging results, all of the patients were divided into the non-HT group and the HT group. Then, the variables were applied in logistic regression (LR) and random forest (RF) algorithms to establish HT prediction models. To evaluate the accuracy of the machine learning models, the models were compared to several of the common scales used in clinics, including the multicenter stroke survey (MSS) score, safe implementation of treatments in stroke (SITS) score, and SEDAN score. The performance of these prediction models was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). Forty-five patients had HT (13.0%) within 48 h after IVT. The ROC curve results showed that the AUCs of HT that were predicted by the RF model, LR model, MSS, SITS, and SEDAN scales after IVT were 0.795 (95% CI, 0.647-0.944), 0.703 (95% CI, 0.515-0.892), 0.657 (95% CI, 0.574-0.741), 0.660 (95% CI, 0.580-0.740) and 0.655 (95% CI, 0.571-0.739), respectively. The RF model performed better than the other models and scales. The top four most influential factors in the RF importance matrix plot were triglyceride, Lpa, the baseline NIHSS, and hemoglobin. The SHapley Additive exPlanation values made the RF prediction model clinically interpretable. In this study, an RF machine learning method was successfully established to predict HT in AIS patients after intravenous alteplase, which the sensitivity was 66.7%, and the specificity was 80.7%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.