ArticleJournal of dental sciences2022
Effects of implant surface mechanical instrumentation methods on peri-implantitis: An
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Implant cleaning performance of powder abrasive devices: an in-vitro study on the non-surgical and surgical approach.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Antibacterial properties of polydopamine-modified ZnO nanoparticles composite films for oral therapeutic applications.Discover nano · 2026Article
- Factors Affecting the Efficacy of Airflowing in Cleaning Implant Surfaces in a Surgical Peri-Implantitis Treatment Simulation-A Laboratory Study.Clinical oral implants research · 2025Article
- In Vitro Assessment of the Potential Effect of Vertical Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Thickness on Nonsurgical and Surgical Implant Surface Decontamination Methods.Clinical oral implants research · 2025Article
- The Effect of NiTi Brush, Polishing Brush, and Chemical Agent on the Dental Implant Surface Morphology and Cytocompatibility.Clinical implant dentistry and related research · 2025Article
- Beyond antibiotics: advances in photothermal strategies for oral infections.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Effect of Implant Instrumentation Techniques in the Success of Implants: An Original Research.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024Article
- Experimental models for peri-implant diseases: a narrative review.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Review
- Biomaterials science and surface engineering strategies for dental peri-implantitis management.Military Medical Research · 2024Review
- Decontamination efficiency of sodium-bicarbonate and glycine air-polishing agents on sand-blasted acid-etched titanium surface and its toxicity against human gingival fibroblasts.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: Although several mechanical and chemical debridement techniques have been reported for the management of peri-implantitis, there is no consensus on the most effective method at present. This Materials and methods: From a total of 15 implants, five each were assigned to one of three decontamination groups (Rotary titanium brush [Ti], tricalcium phosphate air powder abrasive treatment [Air], and titanium ultrasonic scaler [US] groups); the exposed hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated portion was divided into three 1-mm sections (coronal, middle, and apical). The residual-HA of each portion was measured using a digital microscope. Results: The overall percentage of residual HA coating was significantly lower in the US group than in the Ti or Air groups ( Conclusion: Ti and US were more effective for shallow defects, whereas US was more effective for deeper defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.